Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Transfer Rate of Enveloped and Nonenveloped Viruses between Fingerpads and Surfaces.
Anderson, Claire E; Boehm, Alexandria B.
  • Anderson CE; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Universitygrid.168010.e, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Boehm AB; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Universitygrid.168010.e, Stanford, California, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 87(22): e0121521, 2021 10 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1494942
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT
Fomites can represent a reservoir for pathogens, which may be subsequently transferred from surfaces to skin. In this study, we aim to understand how different factors (including virus type, surface type, time since last hand wash, and direction of transfer) affect virus transfer rates, defined as the fraction of virus transferred, between fingerpads and fomites. To determine this, 360 transfer events were performed with 20 volunteers using Phi6 (a surrogate for enveloped viruses), MS2 (a surrogate for nonenveloped viruses), and three clean surfaces (stainless steel, painted wood, and plastic). Considering all transfer events (all surfaces and both transfer directions combined), the mean transfer rates of Phi6 and MS2 were 0.17 and 0.26, respectively. Transfer of MS2 was significantly higher than that of Phi6 (P < 0.05). Surface type was a significant factor that affected the transfer rate of Phi6 Phi6 is more easily transferred to and from stainless steel and plastic than to and from painted wood. Direction of transfer was a significant factor affecting MS2 transfer rates MS2 is more easily transferred from surfaces to fingerpads than from fingerpads to surfaces. Data from these virus transfer events, and subsequent transfer rate distributions, provide information that can be used to refine quantitative microbial risk assessments. This study provides a large-scale data set of transfer events with a surrogate for enveloped viruses, which extends the reach of the study to the role of fomites in the transmission of human enveloped viruses like influenza and SARS-CoV-2. IMPORTANCE This study created a large-scale data set for the transfer of enveloped viruses between skin and surfaces. The data set produced by this study provides information on modeling the distribution of enveloped and nonenveloped virus transfer rates, which can aid in the implementation of risk assessment models in the future. Additionally, enveloped and nonenveloped viruses were applied to experimental surfaces in an equivalent matrix to avoid matrix effects, so results between different viral species can be directly compared without confounding effects of different matrices. Our results indicating how virus type, surface type, time since last hand wash, and direction of transfer affect virus transfer rates can be used in decision-making processes to lower the risk of viral infection from transmission through fomites.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Virus Physiological Phenomena / Fomites / Fingers Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: AEM.01215-21

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Virus Physiological Phenomena / Fomites / Fingers Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: AEM.01215-21