Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Design, content, and fieldwork procedures of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study - Wave 4.
McBride, Orla; Butter, Sarah; Murphy, Jamie; Shevlin, Mark; Hartman, Todd K; Bennett, Kate M; Stocks, Thomas V A; Lloyd, Alex; McKay, Ryan; Gibson-Miller, Jilly; Levita, Liat; Mason, Liam; Martinez, Anton P; Hyland, Philip; Vallières, Frédérique; Karatzias, Thanos; Valiente, Carmen; Vazquez, Carmelo; Bentall, Richard P.
  • McBride O; School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
  • Butter S; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
  • Murphy J; School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
  • Shevlin M; School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
  • Hartman TK; University of Manchester, Manchester, England.
  • Bennett KM; University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England.
  • Stocks TVA; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
  • Lloyd A; Royal Holloway, University of London, London, England.
  • McKay R; Royal Holloway, University of London, London, England.
  • Gibson-Miller J; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
  • Levita L; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
  • Mason L; University College London, London, England.
  • Martinez AP; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
  • Hyland P; Maynooth University, Maynooth, Republic of Ireland.
  • Vallières F; Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
  • Karatzias T; Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Valiente C; Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Vazquez C; Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Bentall RP; University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res ; 31(1): e1899, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1499301
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This paper outlines fieldwork procedures for Wave 4 of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study in the UK during November-December 2020.

METHODS:

Respondents provided data on socio-political attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours, and mental health disorders (anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress). In Phase 1, adults (N = 2878) were reinvited to participate. At Phase 2, new recruitment (i) replenished the longitudinal strand to account for attrition; and (ii) oversampled from the devolved UK nations to facilitate robust between-country analyses for core study outcomes. Weights were calculated using a survey raking algorithm to ensure the longitudinal panel was representative of the baseline sample characteristics.

RESULTS:

In Phase 1, 1796 adults were successfully recontacted and provided full interviews at Wave 4 (62.4% retention rate). In Phase 2, 292 new respondents were recruited to replenish the panel, as well as 1779 adults from Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, who were representative of the socio-political composition of the adult populations in these nations. The raking procedure successfully re-balanced the longitudinal panel to within 1% of population estimates for selected socio-demographic characteristics.

CONCLUSION:

The C19PRC Study offers a unique opportunity to facilitate and stimulate interdisciplinary research addressing important public health questions relating to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Journal subject: Psychiatry Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Journal subject: Psychiatry Year: 2022 Document Type: Article