Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Detection and characterization of COVID-19 findings in chest CT: Feasibility and applicability of an AI-based software tool.
Gashi, Andi; Kubik-Huch, Rahel A; Chatzaraki, Vasiliki; Potempa, Anna; Rauch, Franziska; Grbic, Sasa; Wiggli, Benedikt; Friedl, Andrée; Niemann, Tilo.
  • Gashi A; Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zurich, 101 Rämistrasse, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Kubik-Huch RA; Department of Radiology, Kantonsspital Baden, 1 Im Ergel, Baden, Switzerland.
  • Chatzaraki V; Department of Radiology, Kantonsspital Baden, 1 Im Ergel, Baden, Switzerland.
  • Potempa A; Department of Radiology, Kantonsspital Baden, 1 Im Ergel, Baden, Switzerland.
  • Rauch F; Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 3 Siemensstrasse, Forchheim, Germany.
  • Grbic S; Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 3 Siemensstrasse, Forchheim, Germany.
  • Wiggli B; Department of Infectious Diseases, Kantonsspital Baden, 1 Im Ergel, Baden, Switzerland.
  • Friedl A; Department of Infectious Diseases, Kantonsspital Baden, 1 Im Ergel, Baden, Switzerland.
  • Niemann T; Department of Radiology, Kantonsspital Baden, 1 Im Ergel, Baden, Switzerland.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(41): e27478, 2021 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1501203
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged institutions' diagnostic processes worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software tool that automatically evaluates chest computed tomography for findings of suspected COVID-19.Two groups were retrospectively evaluated for COVID-19-associated ground glass opacities of the lungs (group A real-time polymerase chain reaction positive COVID patients, n = 108; group B asymptomatic pre-operative group, n = 88). The performance of an AI-based software assessment tool for detection of COVID-associated abnormalities was compared with human evaluation based on COVID-19 reporting and data system (CO-RADS) scores performed by 3 readers.All evaluated variables of the AI-based assessment showed significant differences between the 2 groups (P < .01). The inter-reader reliability of CO-RADS scoring was 0.87. The CO-RADS scores were substantially higher in group A (mean 4.28) than group B (mean 1.50). The difference between CO-RADS scoring and AI assessment was statistically significant for all variables but showed good correlation with the clinical context of the CO-RADS score. AI allowed to predict COVID positive cases with an accuracy of 0.94.The evaluated AI-based algorithm detects COVID-19-associated findings with high sensitivity and may support radiologic workflows during the pandemic.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Artificial Intelligence / COVID-19 / Lung Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: MD.0000000000027478

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Artificial Intelligence / COVID-19 / Lung Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: MD.0000000000027478