Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Comparison of the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic with a normal period in terms of orthopaedic trauma: Data from a level 1 trauma centre.
Yavuz, Ibrahim Alper; Kahve, Yakup; Aydin, Tahsin; Gencer, Batuhan; Bingöl, Olgun; Yildirim, Ahmet Özgür.
  • Yavuz IA; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Health Science University, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Kahve Y; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Health Science University, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Aydin T; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Health Science University, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Gencer B; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Health Science University, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Bingöl O; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Health Science University, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Yildirim AÖ; Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Health Science University, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc ; 55(5): 391-395, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1502686
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics and distribution of trauma surgeries performed in the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, the second phase of the pandemic, and the normal period before the pandemic.

METHODS:

Three different time periods were determined.Group 1 represented the first wave of the pandemic, in which lockdowns andrestrictions were strictly applied and only emergency and trauma surgeries wereperformed, between 1 April and 31 May 2020. Group 2 represented the second waveof the pandemic, during which restrictions were not applied and only emergencyand trauma surgeries were performed, from 1 September to 31 October 2020. Group3 represented the normal period before the pandemic, including surgeriesperformed between 1 September and 31 October 2019. In addition, patients ineach group were divided into two groups as younger than 16 or older than 16 inorder to understand the difference between paediatric and adult orthopaedictraumas. The distribution of patients and their fractures were evaluated.

RESULTS:

In Group 1, the rates of intra-articular fractures, distal extremity fractures, and proximal humerus fractures decreased, while the rate of proximal femur fractures increased (P < 0.05 for all). The frequency of hand fractures treated in Groups 1 and 2 compared to Group 3 was reduced (P < 0.05 for both). There was no statistically significant difference between Groups 2 and 3 for fractures in different parts of the body except for hand fractures (P = 0.001 for hand fractures, P > 0.05 for the other fractures).

CONCLUSION:

We observed that the frequency of fractures decreased, and the distribution changed due to severe restrictions and lockdowns in the first wave of the pandemic. When the restrictions and lockdowns were removed in the second wave, the frequency of fractures decreased, but the distribution of fractures was similar to the normal period in 2019. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, Diagnostic Study.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedics / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Language: English Journal: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Journal subject: Orthopedics / Traumatology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.aott.2021.21117

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Orthopedics / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Child / Humans Language: English Journal: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Journal subject: Orthopedics / Traumatology Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.aott.2021.21117