Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Societal shifts due to COVID-19 reveal large-scale complexities and feedbacks between atmospheric chemistry and climate change.
Laughner, Joshua L; Neu, Jessica L; Schimel, David; Wennberg, Paul O; Barsanti, Kelley; Bowman, Kevin W; Chatterjee, Abhishek; Croes, Bart E; Fitzmaurice, Helen L; Henze, Daven K; Kim, Jinsol; Kort, Eric A; Liu, Zhu; Miyazaki, Kazuyuki; Turner, Alexander J; Anenberg, Susan; Avise, Jeremy; Cao, Hansen; Crisp, David; de Gouw, Joost; Eldering, Annmarie; Fyfe, John C; Goldberg, Daniel L; Gurney, Kevin R; Hasheminassab, Sina; Hopkins, Francesca; Ivey, Cesunica E; Jones, Dylan B A; Liu, Junjie; Lovenduski, Nicole S; Martin, Randall V; McKinley, Galen A; Ott, Lesley; Poulter, Benjamin; Ru, Muye; Sander, Stanley P; Swart, Neil; Yung, Yuk L; Zeng, Zhao-Cheng.
  • Laughner JL; Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; jlaugh@caltech.edu jessica.l.neu@jpl.nasa.gov david.schimel@jpl.nasa.gov wennberg@gps.caltech.edu.
  • Neu JL; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109; jlaugh@caltech.edu jessica.l.neu@jpl.nasa.gov david.schimel@jpl.nasa.gov wennberg@gps.caltech.edu.
  • Schimel D; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109; jlaugh@caltech.edu jessica.l.neu@jpl.nasa.gov david.schimel@jpl.nasa.gov wennberg@gps.caltech.edu.
  • Wennberg PO; Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; jlaugh@caltech.edu jessica.l.neu@jpl.nasa.gov david.schimel@jpl.nasa.gov wennberg@gps.caltech.edu.
  • Barsanti K; Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125.
  • Bowman KW; Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.
  • Chatterjee A; Center for Environmental Research and Technology, Riverside, CA 92507.
  • Croes BE; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109.
  • Fitzmaurice HL; Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research, Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD 21046.
  • Henze DK; Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771.
  • Kim J; Energy Research and Development Division, California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CA 95814.
  • Kort EA; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
  • Liu Z; Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
  • Miyazaki K; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
  • Turner AJ; Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
  • Anenberg S; Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
  • Avise J; Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
  • Cao H; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109.
  • Crisp D; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109.
  • de Gouw J; Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
  • Eldering A; Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
  • Fyfe JC; Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052.
  • Goldberg DL; Modeling and Meteorology Branch, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA 95814.
  • Gurney KR; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
  • Hasheminassab S; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109.
  • Hopkins F; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
  • Ivey CE; Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
  • Jones DBA; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109.
  • Liu J; Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2 Canada.
  • Lovenduski NS; Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052.
  • Martin RV; School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011.
  • McKinley GA; Science and Technology Advancement Division, South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA, 91765.
  • Ott L; Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.
  • Poulter B; Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.
  • Ru M; Center for Environmental Research and Technology, Riverside, CA 92507.
  • Sander SP; Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A1 Canada.
  • Swart N; Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109.
  • Yung YL; Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
  • Zeng ZC; Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(46)2021 11 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1510693
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 global pandemic and associated government lockdowns dramatically altered human activity, providing a window into how changes in individual behavior, enacted en masse, impact atmospheric composition. The resulting reductions in anthropogenic activity represent an unprecedented event that yields a glimpse into a future where emissions to the atmosphere are reduced. Furthermore, the abrupt reduction in emissions during the lockdown periods led to clearly observable changes in atmospheric composition, which provide direct insight into feedbacks between the Earth system and human activity. While air pollutants and greenhouse gases share many common anthropogenic sources, there is a sharp difference in the response of their atmospheric concentrations to COVID-19 emissions changes, due in large part to their different lifetimes. Here, we discuss several key takeaways from modeling and observational studies. First, despite dramatic declines in mobility and associated vehicular emissions, the atmospheric growth rates of greenhouse gases were not slowed, in part due to decreased ocean uptake of CO2 and a likely increase in CH4 lifetime from reduced NO x emissions. Second, the response of O3 to decreased NO x emissions showed significant spatial and temporal variability, due to differing chemical regimes around the world. Finally, the overall response of atmospheric composition to emissions changes is heavily modulated by factors including carbon-cycle feedbacks to CH4 and CO2, background pollutant levels, the timing and location of emissions changes, and climate feedbacks on air quality, such as wildfires and the ozone climate penalty.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Atmosphere / Air Pollution / Greenhouse Gases / COVID-19 / Models, Theoretical Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Atmosphere / Air Pollution / Greenhouse Gases / COVID-19 / Models, Theoretical Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article