Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The utility of SARS-CoV-2-specific serology in COVID-19 diagnosis.
Hasan, Tasnim; Lim, H Ling; Case, Jennifer; Hueston, Linda; Bag, Shopna; Dwyer, Dominic E; O'Sullivan, Matthew V N.
  • Hasan T; NSW Health Pathology, ICPMR - Westmead, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales.
  • Lim HL; NSW Health Pathology, ICPMR - Westmead, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales.
  • Case J; NSW Ministry of Health, New South Wales.
  • Hueston L; NSW Health Pathology, ICPMR - Westmead, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales.
  • Bag S; Centre for Population Health, Western Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales.
  • Dwyer DE; NSW Health Pathology, ICPMR - Westmead, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales.
  • O'Sullivan MVN; NSW Health Pathology, ICPMR - Westmead, Westmead Hospital, New South Wales.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 45(6): 616-621, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1511266
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

In May 2020, The Communicable Diseases Network of Australia (CDNA) case definition introduced serological criteria to support the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We present findings that support the utility of SARS-CoV-2-specific serology for public health investigations.

METHODS:

From 24 January to 31 July 2020, the following information was collected from individuals with positive SARS-CoV-2-specific immunofluorescence antibody tests history of contact with COVID-19 cases; recent travel; symptoms consistent with COVID-19; and SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid testing (NAT) results. Individuals were classified as confirmed or probable by CDNA criteria or additionally as possible (SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG positive with compatible symptoms or epidemiologic risk) or indeterminate (SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA/IgM positive only) cases.

RESULTS:

A total of 10,595 individuals were tested in the six-month period. Of these, 9.8% (1,037) individuals had positive SARS-CoV-2-specific serology of which 566 (53.6%) were NAT-confirmed COVID-19 cases and 286 (27.6%) were part of a cruise ship outbreak sero-survey. The remaining 185 individuals (NAT negative) were individually classified as serologically confirmed (4, 0.4%), probable (72, 6.9%) possible (66, 6.4%) and indeterminate (38, 3.7%) cases. Maternal antibody transfer was inferred in one infant and four were unclassified.

CONCLUSION:

SARS-CoV-2-specific serology is a key diagnostic tool for retrospective identification of COVID-19 infection. Implications for public health SARS-CoV-2 specific serology can enhance the ability to find cases, link missing cases in clusters of infection and identify the epidemiological extent of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. A combination of epidemiological criteria, clinical criteria and a quantitative serological test can be used as an adjunct to classify SARS-CoV-2 cases. Our study confirms the low level of community transmission in NSW during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Aust N Z J Public Health Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Aust N Z J Public Health Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article