Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Efficacy analysis of Arbidol treatment in patients with 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.
Chen, Nanjin; Wang, Xiaodan; Zhang, Sheng; Lin, Ronghai; Jiang, Yongpo.
  • Chen N; Department of Anesthesiology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.
  • Wang X; Department of Anesthesiology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.
  • Zhang S; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.
  • Lin R; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, China.
  • Jiang Y; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China.
Ann Palliat Med ; 10(10): 10626-10632, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1515697
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this study was to determine whether Arbidol has a good antiviral effect on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was performed in one of the treatment centers for COVID-19 patients in China from January 2020 to March 2020. The antiviral drug Arbidol (ARB) was administrated to some of the patients at 0.2 g tid po for 7 to 10 days. According to whether patients were given ARB, they were divided into 2 groups the ARB group and the Non-ARB group. The primary outcome was the 14-day COVID-19 negativity rate.

RESULTS:

Of 146 patients, 140 were included. A total of 79 (56.4%) patients received ARB during hospitalization. In the overall cohort, the time of COVID-19 negativity in the ARB group compared with the Non-ARB group was 12.9 days versus 12.7 days (P=0.175; >0.05). The rates of 14-day COVID-19 negativity were 60.8% and 65.6% in the ARB and non-ARB groups, respectively (P=0.559; >0.05). Using an adjusted model, there were no obvious differences in the time of COVID-19 negativity and the rates of 14-day COVID-19 negativity (P>0.05). According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the probabilities of 14-day COVID-19 negativity were similar in the 2 groups (log-rank P=0.130; >0.05). In a multivariate Cox analysis, the variables of age [hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 0.99; P=0.039] and glucose (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.021) were independently associated with 14-day COVID-19 negativity.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our results suggest that there was no apparent favorable clinical response with ARB both in clinical symptoms and the 14-day COVID-19 negativity rate.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Ann Palliat Med Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Apm-21-2397

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Ann Palliat Med Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Apm-21-2397