Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of different air distribution systems in a commercial airliner cabin in terms of comfort and COVID-19 infection risk.
Liu, Mingxin; Liu, Junjie; Cao, Qing; Li, Xingyang; Liu, Sumei; Ji, Shengcheng; Lin, Chao-Hsin; Wei, Daniel; Shen, Xiong; Long, Zhengwei; Chen, Qingyan.
  • Liu M; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
  • Liu J; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
  • Cao Q; School of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology (DUT), 2 Linggong Road, Dalian, 116024, China.
  • Li X; Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.
  • Liu S; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
  • Ji S; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
  • Lin CH; Beijing Aeronautical Science & Technology Research Institute of COMAC, Beijing, China.
  • Wei D; Environmental Control Systems, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Everett, WA, 98203, USA.
  • Shen X; Boeing Research & Technology, Beijing, 100027, China.
  • Long Z; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
  • Chen Q; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.
Build Environ ; 208: 108590, 2022 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1520740
ABSTRACT
The air distribution system in an airliner plays a key role in maintaining a comfortable and healthy environment in the aircraft cabin. To evaluate the performance of a novel displacement ventilation (DV) system and a traditional mixing ventilation (MV) system in an airliner cabin, this study conducted experiments and simulations in a seven-row cabin mockup. This investigation used ultrasonic anemometers and T-thermocouples to measure the air velocity, temperature and distribution of 1 µm and 5 µm particles. Simulation verifications were performed for these operating conditions, and additional scenarios with different occurrence source locations were also simulated. This study combined the Wells-Riley equation with a real case based on a COVID-19 outbreak among passengers on a long-distance bus to obtain the COVID-19 quanta value. Through an evaluation of the airflow organization, thermal comfort, and risk of COVID-19 infection, the two ventilation systems were compared. This investigation found that polydisperse particles should be used to calculate the risk of infection in airliner cabins. In addition, at the beginning of the pandemic, the infection risk with DV was lower than that with MV. In the middle and late stages of the epidemic, the infection risk with MV can be reduced when passengers wear masks, leading to an infection risk approximately equal to that of DV.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Build Environ Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.buildenv.2021.108590

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Build Environ Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.buildenv.2021.108590