Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Implementation of Telehealth for Psychiatric Care in VA Emergency Departments and Urgent Care Clinics.
Ward, Michael J; Shuster, John L; Mohr, Nicholas M; Kaboli, Peter J; Mixon, Amanda S; Kemmer, Jennifer; Campbell, Corey; McNaughton, Candace D.
  • Ward MJ; Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Shuster JL; Vanderbilt University Department of Biomedical Informatics, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Mohr NM; VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Kaboli PJ; VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Mixon AS; Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Iowa City, VA Office of Rural Health, and Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) at the Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
  • Kemmer J; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
  • Campbell C; Department of Emergency Medicine, and University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
  • McNaughton CD; Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Telemed J E Health ; 28(7): 985-993, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1522104
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of an emergency telehealth intervention in unscheduled settings (emergency department [ED] and urgent care clinic [UCC]) within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Materials and

Methods:

We used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of a novel telehealth program implemented in the VHA (Hospital System) in March 2020. We compared the 3 months preimplementation (December 1, 2019 through February 29, 2020) with the 3 months postimplementation (April 1, 2020 through June 30, 2020), then followed sustainability through January 31, 2021. Qualitative data were obtained from surveys and semistructured interviews of staff and providers and analyzed with thematic analysis.

Results:

Patient demographics and dispositions were similar pre- and postimplementation. The telemental health intervention was used in 319 (83%) unscheduled mental health consultations in the postimplementation phase. After implementation, we did not detect adverse trends in length of stay, 7-day revisits, or 30-day mortality. Use remained high with 82% (n = 1,010) of all unscheduled mental health consultations performed by telemental health in the sustainability phase. Staff and clinician interviews identified the following themes in the use of telemental health (1) enhanced efficiency without compromising quality and safety, (2) initial apprehension, (3) the COVID-19 pandemic, and (4) sustainability after resolution of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions:

This mixed-methods evaluation of unscheduled telemental health implementation found that its use was feasible, did not impact the safety and efficacy of mental health consultations, and was highly acceptable and sustainable in unscheduled settings.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Telemed J E Health Journal subject: Medical Informatics / Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tmj.2021.0263

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Telemed J E Health Journal subject: Medical Informatics / Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tmj.2021.0263