Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Effectiveness of 3 Versus 6 ft of Physical Distancing for Controlling Spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Among Primary and Secondary Students and Staff: A Retrospective, Statewide Cohort Study.
van den Berg, Polly; Schechter-Perkins, Elissa M; Jack, Rebecca S; Epshtein, Isabella; Nelson, Richard; Oster, Emily; Branch-Elliman, Westyn.
  • van den Berg P; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Schechter-Perkins EM; Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Jack RS; COVID-19 School Response Dashboard, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Epshtein I; VA Boston Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Nelson R; IDEAS Center, Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Oster E; Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Branch-Elliman W; COVID-19 School Response Dashboard, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(10): 1871-1878, 2021 11 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1522146
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

National and international guidelines differ about the optimal physical distancing between students for prevention of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission; studies directly comparing the impact of ≥3 versus ≥6 ft of physical distancing policies in school settings are lacking. Thus, our objective was to compare incident cases of SARS-CoV-2 in students and staff in Massachusetts public schools among districts with different physical distancing requirements. State guidance mandates masking for all school staff and for students in grades 2 and higher; the majority of districts required universal masking.

METHODS:

Community incidence rates of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2 cases among students in grades K-12 and staff participating in-person learning, and district infection control plans were linked. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for students and staff members in traditional public school districts with ≥3 versus ≥6 ft of physical distancing were estimated using log-binomial regression; models adjusted for community incidence are also reported.

RESULTS:

Among 251 eligible school districts, 537 336 students and 99 390 staff attended in-person instruction during the 16-week study period, representing 6 400 175 student learning weeks and 1 342 574 staff learning weeks. Student case rates were similar in the 242 districts with ≥3 versus ≥6 ft of physical distancing between students (IRR, 0.891; 95% confidence interval, .594-1.335); results were similar after adjustment for community incidence (adjusted IRR, 0.904; .616-1.325). Cases among school staff in districts with ≥3 versus ≥6 ft of physical distancing were also similar (IRR, 1.015, 95% confidence interval, .754-1.365).

CONCLUSIONS:

Lower physical distancing requirements can be adopted in school settings with masking mandates without negatively affecting student or staff safety.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cid

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Clin Infect Dis Journal subject: Communicable Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cid