Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Community socioeconomic deprivation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk: findings from Portugal.
Magalhães, João Paulo M; Ribeiro, Ana Isabel; Caetano, Constantino P; Sá Machado, Rita.
  • Magalhães JPM; Unidade de Saúde Pública, ACES Porto Oriental, Administração Regional de Saúde do Norte, Porto, Portugal.
  • Ribeiro AI; Divisão de Epidemiologia e Estatística, Direção-Geral da Saúde, Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Caetano CP; EPIUnit-Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Sá Machado R; Departamento Ciências da Saúde Pública e Forenses, e Educação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Eur J Public Health ; 32(1): 145-150, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1522181
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Socioeconomic differences have been observed in the risk of acquiring infectious diseases, but evidence regarding SARS-CoV-2 remains sparse. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection risk and socioeconomic deprivation, exploring whether this association varied according to different phases of the national pandemic response.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study was conducted. Data routinely collected for patients with a laboratorial result recorded in SINAVE®, between 2 March and 14 June 2020, were analysed. Socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using quintiles of the European Deprivation Index (Q1-least deprived to Q5-most deprived). Response phases were defined as before, during and after the national State of Emergency. Associations were estimated using multilevel analyses.

RESULTS:

The study included 223 333 individuals (14.7% were SARS-CoV-2 positive cases). SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence ratio increased with deprivation [PR(Q1)=Ref; PR(Q2)=1.37 (95% CI 1.19-1.58), PR(Q3)=1.48 (95% CI 1.26-1.73), PR(Q4)=1.73 (95% CI 1.47-2.04), PR(Q5)=2.24 (95% CI 1.83-2.75)]. This was observed during the State of Emergency [PR(Q5)=2.09 (95% CI 1.67-2.62)] and more pronounced after the State of Emergency [PR(Q5)= 3.43 (95% CI 2.66-4.44)].

CONCLUSION:

The effect of socioeconomic deprivation in the SARS-CoV-2 infection risk emerged after the implementation of the first State of Emergency in Portugal, and became more pronounced as social distancing policies eased. Decision-makers should consider these results when deliberating future mitigation measures.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Eur J Public Health Journal subject: Epidemiology / Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Eurpub

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Eur J Public Health Journal subject: Epidemiology / Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Eurpub