Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Effect of INTELLiVENT-ASV versus Conventional Ventilation on Ventilation Intensity in Patients with COVID-19 ARDS-An Observational Study.
Buiteman-Kruizinga, Laura A; Mkadmi, Hassan E; Serpa Neto, Ary; Kruizinga, Matthijs D; Botta, Michela; Schultz, Marcus J; Paulus, Frederique; van der Heiden, Pim L J.
  • Buiteman-Kruizinga LA; Department of Intensive Care, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, 2625 AD Delft, The Netherlands.
  • Mkadmi HE; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location 'AMC', 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Serpa Neto A; Department of Research, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, 2625 AD Delft, The Netherlands.
  • Kruizinga MD; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location 'AMC', 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Botta M; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care-Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
  • Schultz MJ; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo 05652-900, Brazil.
  • Paulus F; Department of Pediatrics, Juliana Children's Hospital, 2545 AA The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • van der Heiden PLJ; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location 'AMC', 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Med ; 10(22)2021 Nov 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1524047
ABSTRACT
Driving pressure (ΔP) and mechanical power (MP) are associated with outcomes in critically ill patients, irrespective of the presence of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). INTELLiVENT-ASV, a fully automated ventilatory mode, controls the settings that affect ΔP and MP. This study compared the intensity of ventilation (ΔP and MP) with INTELLiVENT-ASV versus conventional ventilation in a cohort of COVID-19 ARDS patients in two intensive care units in the Netherlands. The coprimary endpoints were ΔP and MP before and after converting from conventional ventilation to INTELLiVENT-ASV. Compared to conventional ventilation, INTELLiVENT-ASV delivered ventilation with a lower ΔP and less MP. With conventional ventilation, ΔP was 13 cmH2O, and MP was 21.5 and 24.8 J/min, whereas with INTELLiVENT-ASV, ΔP was 11 and 10 cmH2O (mean difference -2 cm H2O (95 %CI -2.5 to -1.2 cm H2O), p < 0.001) and MP was 18.8 and 17.5 J/min (mean difference -7.3 J/Min (95% CI -8.8 to -5.8 J/min), p < 0.001). Conversion from conventional ventilation to INTELLiVENT-ASV resulted in a lower intensity of ventilation. These findings may favor the use of INTELLiVENT-ASV in COVID-19 ARDS patients, but future studies remain needed to see if the reduction in the intensity of ventilation translates into clinical benefits.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jcm10225409

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jcm10225409