Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Patient perspectives and experiences of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19 - a qualitative study among women with gynecological cancer.
Christiansen, Mille Guldager; Pappot, Helle; Pedersen, Charlotte; Jarden, Mary; Mirza, Mansoor Raza; Piil, Karin.
  • Christiansen MG; Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. mille.guldager.christiansen@regionh.dk.
  • Pappot H; Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Pedersen C; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Jarden M; Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Mirza MR; Department of Haematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Piil K; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(3): 2545-2554, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1525538
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Due to the first COVID-19 outbreak and subsequent restrictions, standard practice for gynecological cancer quickly evolved to include additional digital consultations. Women with gynecological cancer have a high need for information and experience a high symptom burden. We aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of the rapid implementation of digital consultations during COVID-19.

METHODS:

We conducted individual telephone interviews with patients with gynecological cancer 1-4 days after a telephone or video consultation during the COVID-19 outbreak in April and May 2020. We applied Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis to analyze the qualitative data.

RESULTS:

Thirty-two patients with ovarian (50%), cervical (35%), vulvar (12%), and vaginal cancer (3%) participated in the study. The patients experienced that, combined, cancer and COVID-19 restrictions made their situation twice as challenging. In general, the patients valued face-to-face consultations, recommending that they were ideal for the initial appointment to build trust. Overall, there was a willingness to participate in digital consultations because of the restrictions, but the results also showed varying degrees of openness and that individual solutions were favored.

CONCLUSION:

The findings of this study show that digital consultations were an accepted alternative during COVID-19. Even though this temporary solution was deemed to be beneficial for practical reasons, patients also experienced digital consultations to be impersonal. A key message is that face-to-face encounters create the foundation to establish a trusting relationship from where a valuable dialogue arises. Digital consultations should therefore be implemented with caution since no one-size-fits-all model is recommended. Among patients with gynecological cancer, however, digital technologies represent a promising and flexible method depending on the purpose of consultations, patient preferences, and needs.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Neoplasms Type of study: Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Support Care Cancer Journal subject: Neoplasms / Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00520-021-06651-6

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Neoplasms Type of study: Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Support Care Cancer Journal subject: Neoplasms / Health Services Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00520-021-06651-6