Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Prone positioning for non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fazzini, Brigitta; Page, Alexandria; Pearse, Rupert; Puthucheary, Zudin.
  • Fazzini B; Adult Critical Care Unit, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: brigitta.fazzini@nhs.net.
  • Page A; Adult Critical Care Unit, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Pearse R; Adult Critical Care Unit, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Puthucheary Z; Adult Critical Care Unit, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK; William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Br J Anaesth ; 128(2): 352-362, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1525703
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prone positioning in non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients is becoming widely applied in practice alongside noninvasive respiratory support. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effect, timing, and populations that might benefit from awake proning regarding oxygenation, mortality, and tracheal intubation compared with supine position in hypoxaemic acute respiratory failure.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and BMJ Best Practice until August 2021 (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO] registration CRD42021250322). Studies included comprise least-wise 20 adult patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure secondary to acute respiratory distress syndrome or coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

RESULTS:

Fourteen studies fulfilled the selection criteria and 2352 patients were included; of those patients, 99% (n=2332/2352) had COVID-19. Amongst 1041 (44%) patients who were placed in the prone position, 1021 were SARS-CoV-2 positive. The meta-analysis revealed significant improvement in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (mean difference -23.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] -34.80 to 11.39; P=0.0001; I2=26%) after prone positioning. In patients with COVID-19, lower mortality was found in the group placed in the prone position (150/771 prone vs 391/1457 supine; odds ratio [OR] 0.51; 95% CI 0.32-0.80; P=0.003; I2=48%), but the tracheal intubation rate was unchanged (284/824 prone vs 616/1271 supine; OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.43-1.22; P=0.220; I2=75%). Overall proning was tolerated for a median of 4 h (inter-quartile range 2-16).

CONCLUSIONS:

Prone positioning can improve oxygenation amongst non-intubated patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure when applied for at least 4 h over repeated daily episodes. Awake proning appears safe, but the effect on tracheal intubation rate and survival remains uncertain.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Insufficiency / Wakefulness / Prone Position / Patient Positioning / Noninvasive Ventilation / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Br J Anaesth Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Insufficiency / Wakefulness / Prone Position / Patient Positioning / Noninvasive Ventilation / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Br J Anaesth Year: 2022 Document Type: Article