Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Intubation using VieScope vs. Video laryngoscopy in full personal protective equipment - a randomized, controlled simulation trial.
Ecker, Hannes; Kolvenbach, Simone; Herff, Holger; Wetsch, Wolfgang A.
  • Ecker H; Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
  • Kolvenbach S; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
  • Herff H; Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
  • Wetsch WA; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 21(1): 288, 2021 11 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1528675
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

VieScope is a new type of laryngoscope, with a straight, transparent and illuminated blade, allowing for direct line of sight towards the larynx. In addition, VieScope is disposed of after single patient use, which can avoid cross-contaminations of contagious material. This has gained importance especially when treating patients with highly contagious infectious diseases, such as during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic. In this context, VieScope has not been evaluated yet in a clinical study. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

This study compared intubation with VieScope to video-laryngoscopy (GlideScope) in normal and difficult airway in a standardized airway manikin in a randomized controlled simulation trial. Thirty-five medical specialists were asked to perform endotracheal intubation in full personal protective equipment (PPE). Primary endpoint was correct tube position. First-pass rate (i.e., success rate at the first attempt), time until intubation and time until first correct ventilation were registered as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS:

For correct tracheal tube placement, there was no significant difference between VieScope and GlideScope in normal and difficult airway conditions. VieScope had over 91% fist-pass success rate in normal airway setting. VieScope had a comparable success rate to GlideScope in difficult airway, but had a significantly longer time until intubation and time until ventilation.

CONCLUSION:

VieScope and GlideScope had high success rates in normal as well as in difficult airway. There was no unrecognized esophageal intubation in either group. Overall time for intubation was longer in the VieScope group, though in an acceptable range given in literature. Results from this simulation study suggest that VieScope may be an acceptable alternative for tracheal intubation in full PPE. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register www.drks.de (Registration date 09/11/2020; TrialID DRKS00023406 ).
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Airway Management / Personal Protective Equipment / Intubation, Intratracheal / Laryngoscopy Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12871-021-01502-7

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Airway Management / Personal Protective Equipment / Intubation, Intratracheal / Laryngoscopy Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12871-021-01502-7