Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Can a Set of Questions after Routine Cataract Surgery Predict Unexpected Findings and Avoid an Unnecessary Follow-Up Visit?
Zemaitiene, Reda; Pasiskeviciute, Ieva; Varoniukaite, Aiste; Pajeda, Pijus; Grzybowski, Andrzej; Zaliuniene, Dalia.
  • Zemaitiene R; Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44037 Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Pasiskeviciute I; Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44037 Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Varoniukaite A; Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44037 Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Pajeda P; Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44037 Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Grzybowski A; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10719 Olsztyn, Poland.
  • Zaliuniene D; Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, 61553 Poznan, Poland.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(11)2021 Oct 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1534172
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

to evaluate whether a set of questions after a routine cataract surgery can predict unexpected findings and avoid an unnecessary follow-up visit. Materials and

Methods:

single-center, prospective, cohort study included 177 routine cataract surgery cases of two experienced surgeons between November 2019 and December 2020. Inclusion criteria included unremarkable postoperative day one follow-up examination. A set of seven questions regarding complaints with positive or negative answers was presented at the second follow-up visit (PV2)-one week (mean 8.34 ± 1.73 days) after the surgery. The outcome measures were the incidence of unexpected management changes (UMCs) at the PV2 visit (change or addition from a prescribed postoperative drop plan, extra procedures, an urgent referral to an ophthalmologist) and UMCs associations with the answers to a question set.

Results:

81.4% of patients had no complaints about postoperative ocular status and answered with negative answers, 18.6% reported one or more complaint (positive answer) dissatisfaction with postoperative visual acuity (6.2%, 11 cases), eye pain (4.0%, 7 cases), increase in floaters after the surgery (4.0%, 7 cases), red eye (4.0%, 7 cases) and others. The prevalence of UMCs at PV2 was 1.7% (3 cases), of which 0.6% (1 case) was the prolonged antibiotic prescription due to conjunctivitis, 0.6% (1 case) was the addition of IOP lowering medication and 0.6% (1 case) was additional medication due to uveitis management. None of the complaints (positive answers) at PV2 were associated with the incidence of UMCs (p > 0.05).

Conclusions:

there were no associations of UMCs determined with positive answers to the questions. The prediction of UMCs incidence based on the positive answers was not obtained. Thus, we cannot exclude the necessity of a postoperative week one follow-up visit.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cataract / Cataract Extraction Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Medicina57111144

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cataract / Cataract Extraction Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Medicina57111144