Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Chlorhexidine mouthwash reduces the salivary viral load of SARS-CoV-2: A randomized clinical trial.
Costa, Denis Damião; Brites, Carlos; Vaz, Sara Nunes; de Santana, Daniele Souza; Dos Santos, Jean Nunes; Cury, Patricia Ramos.
  • Costa DD; Postgraduate Program in Dentistry and Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
  • Brites C; Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory, Professor Edgard Santos Hospital, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
  • Vaz SN; Postgraduate Program in Medicine and Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
  • de Santana DS; Postgraduate Program in Medicine and Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
  • Dos Santos JN; Postgraduate Program in Medicine and Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
  • Cury PR; Postgraduate Program in Dentistry and Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Oral Dis ; 28 Suppl 2: 2500-2508, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1537848
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate on the salivary load of SARS-CoV-2. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed on 100 participants positive for SARS-CoV-2. In the test group (n = 50), volunteers gargled with a mouthwash containing 15 ml of 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate for 1 min, while the control group (n = 50) used a placebo. Saliva samples were obtained before (baseline) and 5 and 60 min after using the solutions. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays (qRT-PCR) were carried out and the cycle threshold (Ct) was computed. The chi-square test and t-test were used for group comparison (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS:

The differences in Ct values between the 5-min evaluation and baseline (test group 2.19 ± 4.30; control -0.40 ± 3.87, p = 0.002) and between 60 min and baseline (test group 2.45 ± 3.88; control 0.76 ± 4.41, p = 0.05) were significantly greater in the test group, revealing a reduction of viral load. Furthermore, there was a reduction in the load of SARS-CoV-2 in 72% of the volunteers using chlorhexidine versus 30% in the control group (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Chlorhexidine gluconate (0.12%) was effective in reducing salivary SARS-CoV-2 load for at least 60 min.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Oral Dis Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Odi.14086

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Oral Dis Journal subject: Dentistry Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Odi.14086