Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of a novel, rapid antigen detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.
Thell, Rainer; Kallab, Verena; Weinhappel, Wolfgang; Mueckstein, Wolfgang; Heschl, Lukas; Heschl, Martina; Korsatko, Stefan; Toedling, Franz; Blaschke, Amelie; Herzog, Theresa; Klicpera, Anna; Koeller, Clara; Haugk, Moritz; Kreil, Anna; Spiel, Alexander; Kreuzer, Philipp; Krause, Robert; Sebesta, Christian; Winkler, Stefan; Laky, Brenda; Szell, Marton.
  • Thell R; Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Vienna, Australia.
  • Kallab V; Department of Internal Medicine 2, Emergency Department, Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria.
  • Weinhappel W; Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Vienna, Australia.
  • Mueckstein W; Department of Internal Medicine 2, Emergency Department, Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria.
  • Heschl L; Primary Health Care Centre Medizin Mariahilf, Vienna, Austria.
  • Heschl M; Primary Health Care Centre Medizin Mariahilf, Vienna, Austria.
  • Korsatko S; Primary Health Care Centre Landarztteam, Oed, Austria.
  • Toedling F; Primary Health Care Centre Landarztteam, Oed, Austria.
  • Blaschke A; Primary Health Care Centre Medius, Graz, Austria.
  • Herzog T; Primary Health Care Centre Praxis Dr Toedling, Probstdorf, Austria.
  • Klicpera A; Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Vienna, Australia.
  • Koeller C; Department of Internal Medicine 2, Emergency Department, Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria.
  • Haugk M; Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Vienna, Australia.
  • Kreil A; Department of Internal Medicine 2, Emergency Department, Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria.
  • Spiel A; Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Vienna, Australia.
  • Kreuzer P; Department of Internal Medicine 2, Emergency Department, Klinik Donaustadt, Vienna, Austria.
  • Krause R; Emergency Department, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Sebesta C; Semmelweis University Budapest, Hungary.
  • Winkler S; Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Vienna, Australia.
  • Laky B; Emergency Department, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Szell M; Wiener Gesundheitsverbund, Vienna, Australia.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0259527, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1542179
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is currently finally determined in laboratory settings by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase-chain-reaction (rt-PCR). However, simple testing with immediately available results are crucial to gain control over COVID-19. The aim was to evaluate such a point-of-care antigen rapid test (AG-rt) device in its performance compared to laboratory-based rt-PCR testing in COVID-19 suspected, symptomatic patients.

METHODS:

For this prospective study, two specimens each of 541 symptomatic female (54.7%) and male (45.3%) patients aged between 18 and 95 years tested at five emergency departments (ED, n = 296) and four primary healthcare centres (PHC, n = 245), were compared, using AG-rt (positive/negative/invalid) and rt-PCR (positive/negative and cycle threshold, Ct) to diagnose SARS-CoV-2. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios (LR+/-) of the AG-rt were assessed.

RESULTS:

Differences between ED and PHC were detected regarding gender, age, symptoms, disease prevalence, and diagnostic performance. Overall, 174 (32.2%) were tested positive on AG-rt and 213 (39.4%) on rt-PCR. AG correctly classified 91.7% of all rt-PCR positive cases with a sensitivity of 80.3%, specificity of 99.1%, PPV of 98.3, NPV of 88.6%, LR(+) of 87.8, and LR(-) of 0.20. The highest sensitivities and specificities of AG-rt were detected in PHC (sensitivity 84.4%, specificity 100.0%), when using Ct of 30 as cut-off (sensitivity 92.5%, specificity 97.8%), and when symptom onset was within the first three days (sensitivity 82.9%, specificity 99.6%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The highest sensitivity was detected with a high viral load. Our findings suggest that AG-rt are comparable to rt-PCR to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 suspected symptomatic patients presenting both at emergency departments and primary health care centres.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Serological Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antigens, Viral Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0259527

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Serological Testing / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 / Antigens, Viral Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0259527