Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of five widely used serologic assays for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2.
Stocking, Christopher; de Miguel, Laura; Suteu, Gabriela; Dressel, Alexander; Soricelli, Andrea; Roskos, Martin; Valor, Santiago; Mutschmann, Caren; März, Winfried.
  • Stocking C; SYNLAB Analytics and Services Germany GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  • de Miguel L; SYNLAB Global Diagnostics, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain.
  • Suteu G; SYNLAB Medical Care Center Leverkusen GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.
  • Dressel A; D(2) Consulting, Mannheim, Germany.
  • Soricelli A; IRCCS SDN, Naples Italy.
  • Roskos M; SYNLAB Holding Deutschland GmbH, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Valor S; SYNLAB International GmbH, München.
  • Mutschmann C; SYNLAB Analytics and Services Germany GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  • März W; SYNLAB Academy, Mannheim, Germany; Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University of Graz, Graz; Medical Clinic V, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany. Electronic address: Winfried.Maerz@synlab.com.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 102(2): 115587, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1544970
ABSTRACT
Reliable diagnostic technologies are pivotal to the fight against COVID-19. While real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) remains the gold standard, commercial assays for antibodies against (SARS-CoV-2) have emerged. We sought to examine 5 widely used commercial methods. We measured antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 with assays, Abbott-IgG, Roche-IgT (total antibodies, isotype-unspecific), EUROIMMUN-IgG, EUROIMMUN-IgA, DiaSorin-IgG, in 191 serum samples from patients with rRT-PCR proven COVID-19 between days 0 and 47 after the onset of clinical symptoms and in biobank samples collected in 2018. The assays were calibrated using the manufacturers' instructions; results are in multiples of the assay specific cut-offs (Abbott, Roche, EUROIMMUN) or in arbitrary units (AU/mL, DiaSorin). The assays for IgG and IgT have approximately the same sensitivity and specificity for detecting seroconversion which starts at approximately day 3 after symptom onset, sensitivity reached 93% on day 16 and was 100% for each assay on day 20. The assay for IgA antibodies was superior in sensitivity and had a lower specificity than the others. Bivariate non-parametric correlation coefficients ranged between 0.738 and 0.991. Commercial assays for IgG or total antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are largely equivalent for establishing seroconversion but differ at high antibody titres. Increased sensitivity to detect seroconversion is afforded by including IgA antibodies. Further international efforts to harmonise assays for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are urgently needed.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Serological Testing / COVID-19 / Antibodies, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.diagmicrobio.2021.115587

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Serological Testing / COVID-19 / Antibodies, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.diagmicrobio.2021.115587