Your browser doesn't support javascript.
French experience with telemedicine in inflammatory bowel disease: a patients and physicians survey.
Guillo, Lucas; Bonnaud, Guillaume; Nahon, Stéphane; Caron, Bénédicte; Olympie, Alain; Laurain, Anne; Serrero, Mélanie; Buisson, Anne; Peyrin-Biroulet, Laurent.
  • Guillo L; Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Marseille Nord, University of Aix-Marseille, Marseille.
  • Bonnaud G; Clinique Ambroise Paré, Toulouse.
  • Nahon S; Department of Gastroenterology, Groupe Hospitalier Le Raincy-Montfermeil.
  • Caron B; Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, University Hospital of Nancy, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy.
  • Olympie A; Association François-Aupetit, AFA Crohn RCH, Paris.
  • Laurain A; Ramsay clinique Blomet, Paris.
  • Serrero M; APHP, Service de Gastroentérologie et de Proctologie, CHU Bichat, Paris, France.
  • Buisson A; Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Marseille Nord, University of Aix-Marseille, Marseille.
  • Peyrin-Biroulet L; Association François-Aupetit, AFA Crohn RCH, Paris.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 34(4): 398-404, 2022 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1550620
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

The use of telemedicine dramatically increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. We collected patients and physicians experience on telemedicine in the field of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS:

We conducted a nationwide survey between September 2020 and January 2021. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to participants through mailing lists of the national patients' association and IBD expert groups.

RESULTS:

Overall, 300 patients and 110 gastroenterologists filled out the survey. On a 10 points scale of satisfaction with telemedicine, 60% of patients noted a score ≥8 and 52.7% of physicians ≥7. Patients and gastroenterologists felt that the duration of teleconsultations appeared to be shorter than in-person visits in 57.5 and 55.1% of cases, respectively. All participants agreed that telemedicine is appropriate in dedicated situations and not for flare-up consultations. For 55.1% of patients, quality of care was the same via telemedicine, whereas 51.4% of gastroenterologists believed they managed less well their patients. Lack of clinical examination being pointed out as the main limitation of telemedicine. Three-quarters of patients and gastroenterologists would agree to use telemedicine more often in the future.

CONCLUSION:

Patients and gastroenterologists were satisfied with telemedicine and would be willing to use it in the future. However, telemedicine does not replace in-person visits and should be discussed on a case-by-case basis.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physicians / Inflammatory Bowel Diseases / Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Journal subject: Gastroenterology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Physicians / Inflammatory Bowel Diseases / Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Journal subject: Gastroenterology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article