Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Scoping review protocol to understand the conceptualisation, implementation and practices of health promotion within the context of primary healthcare in Africa.
Nkangu, Miriam; Obegu, Pamela; Asahngwa, Constantine; Shiroya, Veronica; Gobina, Ronald; Agbaw-Ebai, Fleur Pembe; Keboa, Mark; Foretia, Denis.
  • Nkangu M; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada mnkangu@alliancehp.org.
  • Obegu P; Research and Capacity Building, Health Promotion Alliance Cameroon (HPAC), Yaounde, Cameroon.
  • Asahngwa C; Research and Capacity Building, Health Promotion Alliance Cameroon (HPAC), Yaounde, Cameroon.
  • Shiroya V; Research and Capacity Building, Health Promotion Alliance Cameroon (HPAC), Yaounde, Cameroon.
  • Gobina R; Nkafu Policy Institute, Denis and Lenora Foretia Foundation Cameroon, Yaounde, Cameroon.
  • Agbaw-Ebai FP; Health Promotion Alliance Kenya, Kitale, Kenya.
  • Keboa M; Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
  • Foretia D; Research and Capacity Building, Health Promotion Alliance Cameroon (HPAC), Yaounde, Cameroon.
BMJ Open ; 11(12): e049084, 2021 12 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1550954
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of health promotion in empowering and sustaining communities, as well as the need to build resilient health systems and work collectively with other sectors to protect and promote health. The WHO has mainstreamed health promotion in the Global health agenda. However, the definition and practices of health promotion in Africa are not well understood and documented, with often, an interchangeable use of the concept of health promotion and health prevention. This scoping review is to explore how health promotion is defined and practised in Africa and identify gaps in its implementation within the framework of the Ottawa Charter. METHODS AND

ANALYSIS:

The scoping review will employ the approach described by Arksey and O'Malley in 2005. The approach consists of five stages (1) formulating the research questions, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) selecting eligible studies, (4) charting the data and (5) collating, summarising and reporting the results. This protocol employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). The review will apply the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews to present the results. The scoping review will adapt the five principles set forth in the Ottawa Charter to categorise the outcomes and uses its strategies to define the interventions. Data bases searched are Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, SCOPUS, CABI, JBI Evidence Synthesis and grey literature. The database last searched was January 2021. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This review does not require ethics approval. Our dissemination strategy includes peer review publication, policy brief, presentation at conferences and relevant stakeholders.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Health Promotion Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-049084

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Health Promotion Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-049084