Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Impact of COVID-19 on Continuing Medical Education-Results of an Online Survey Among Users of a Non-profit Multi-Specialty Live Online Education Platform.
Schulte, Tobias L; Gröning, Thilo; Ramsauer, Babett; Weimann, Jörg; Pin, Martin; Jerusalem, Karen; Ridwan, Sami.
  • Schulte TL; Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
  • Gröning T; Joint Practice for Gynecology, Moenchengladbach, Germany.
  • Ramsauer B; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vivantes Klinikum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Weimann J; Department of Anesthesiology and Interdisciplinary Intensive Care Medicine, Sankt Gertrauden Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
  • Pin M; Emergency Department, Florence-Nightingale Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany.
  • Jerusalem K; German Society of Emergency and Acute Medicine DGINA, Berlin, Germany.
  • Ridwan S; Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Ibbenbueren, Ibbenbueren, Germany.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 8: 773806, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1556063
ABSTRACT

Background:

The Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic accelerated digitalization in medical education. Continuing medical education (CME) as a substantial component of this system was relevantly affected. Here, we present the results of an online survey highlighting the impact on and the role of online CME.

Methods:

An online survey of 44 questions was completed by users of a German online CME platform receiving an invitation via newsletter. CME habits, requirements, personal perception, and impact of the pandemic were inquired. Standard statistical methods were applied.

Results:

A total of 2,961 responders took the survey with 2,949 completed surveys included in the final analysis. Most contributions originated from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Physicians accounted for 78.3% (57.5% hospital doctors) of responses followed by midwives (7.3%) and paramedics (5.7%). Participating physicians were mainly board-certified specialists (69%; 55.75% hospital specialists, 13.25% specialists in private practice). Frequent online lectures at regular intervals (77.8%) and combined face-to-face and online CME (55.9%) were favored. A duration of 1-2 h was found ideal (57.5%). Technical issues were less a major concern since the pandemic.

Conclusion:

A shift from face-to-face toward online CME events was expectedly detected since the outbreak. Online CME was accelerated and promoted by the pandemic. According to the perception of users, the CME system appears to have reacted adequately to meet their demand but does not replace human interaction.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fmed.2021.773806

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fmed.2021.773806