Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The effect of different COVID-19 public health restrictions on mobility: A systematic review.
Tully, Mark A; McMaw, Laura; Adlakha, Deepti; Blair, Neale; McAneney, Jonny; McAneney, Helen; Carmichael, Christina; Cunningham, Conor; Armstrong, Nicola C; Smith, Lee.
  • Tully MA; Institute of Mental Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom.
  • McMaw L; School of Health Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom.
  • Adlakha D; Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning, Natural Learning Initiative, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
  • Blair N; Built Environment Research Institute, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom.
  • McAneney J; Institute of Mental Health Sciences, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, United Kingdom.
  • McAneney H; UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Carmichael C; Centre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Cunningham C; Institute of Public Health, City Exchange, Belfast, United Kingdom.
  • Armstrong NC; Health and Social Care Research & Development Division, Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), Belfast, United Kingdom.
  • Smith L; Centre for Health, Performance and Wellbeing, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0260919, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1559387
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, most countries have introduced non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as stay-at-home orders, to reduce person-to-person contact and break trains of transmission. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effect of different public health restrictions on mobility across different countries and cultures. The University of Bern COVID-19 Living Evidence database of COVID-19 and SARS-COV-2 publications was searched for retrospective or prospective studies evaluating the impact of COVID-19 public health restrictions on Google Mobility. Titles and abstracts were independently screened by two authors. Information from included studies was extracted by one researcher and double checked by another. Risk of bias of included articles was assessed using the Newcastle Ottowa Scale. Given the heterogeneous nature of the designs used, a narrative synthesis was undertaken. From the search, 1672 references were identified, of which 14 were included in the narrative synthesis. All studies reported data from the first wave of the pandemic, with Google Mobility Scores included from January to August 2020, with most studies analysing data during the first two months of the pandemic. Seven studies were assessed as having a moderate risk of bias and seven as a low risk of bias. Countries that introduced more stringent public health restrictions experienced greater reductions in mobility, through increased time at home and reductions in visits to shops, workplaces and use of public transport. Stay-at-home orders were the most effective of the individual strategies, whereas mask mandates had little effect of mobility.

CONCLUSIONS:

Public health restrictions, particularly stay-at-home orders have significantly impacted on transmission prevention behaviours. Further research is required to understand how to effectively address pandemic fatigue and to support the safe return back to normal day-to-day behaviours.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Public Health / COVID-19 / Movement Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0260919

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Public Health / COVID-19 / Movement Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0260919