Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for SARS-CoV-2: a multi-centered, prospective, observational study in critically ill 92 patients in Saudi Arabia.
Alhumaid, Saad; Al Mutair, Abbas; Alghazal, Header A; Alhaddad, Ali J; Al-Helal, Hassan; Al Salman, Sadiq A; Alali, Jalal; Almahmoud, Sana; Alhejy, Zulfa M; Albagshi, Ahmad A; Muhammad, Javed; Khan, Amjad; Sulaiman, Tarek; Al-Mozaini, Maha; Dhama, Kuldeep; Al-Tawfiq, Jaffar A; Rabaan, Ali A.
  • Alhumaid S; Administration of Pharmaceutical Care, Al-Ahsa Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia. saalhumaid@moh.gov.sa.
  • Al Mutair A; Research Center, Almoosa Specialist Hospital, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alghazal HA; College of Nursing, Princess Norah Bint Abdul Rahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alhaddad AJ; School of Nursing, Wollongong University, Wollongong, Australia.
  • Al-Helal H; Microbiology Laboratory, Prince Saud Bin Jalawi Hospital, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
  • Al Salman SA; Microbiology Department, Omran General Hospital, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alali J; Division of Laboratory, Medical Microbiology Department, Maternity and Children Hospital, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
  • Almahmoud S; Division of Neurology, Internal Medicine Department, King Fahad Hofuf Hospital, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alhejy ZM; Internal Medicine Department, King Fahad Hofuf Hospital, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
  • Albagshi AA; Department of Nursing Education, College of Nursing, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Faisal Road, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
  • Muhammad J; Administration of Pharmaceutical Care, Al-Ahsa Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.
  • Khan A; Administration of Pharmaceutical Care, Al-Ahsa Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.
  • Sulaiman T; Department of Microbiology, The University of Haripur, Haripur, 22620, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Al-Mozaini M; Department of Public Health/Nutrition, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan.
  • Dhama K; Infectious Diseases Section, Medical Specialties Department, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  • Al-Tawfiq JA; Immunocompromised Host Research Unit, Department of Infection and Immunity, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, 11211, Saudi Arabia.
  • Rabaan AA; Division of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, 243122, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Eur J Med Res ; 26(1): 141, 2021 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1566531
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used as a rescue strategy in patients with severe with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, but there has been little evidence of its efficacy.

OBJECTIVES:

To describe the effect of ECMO rescue therapy on patient-important outcomes in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS:

A case series study was conducted for the laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 patients who were admitted to the ICUs of 22 Saudi hospitals, between March 1, 2020, and October 30, 2020, by reviewing patient's medical records prospectively.

RESULTS:

ECMO use was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (40.2% vs. 48.9%; p = 0.000); lower COVID-19 virological cure (41.3% vs 14.1%, p = 0.000); and longer hospitalization (20.2 days vs 29.1 days; p = 0.000), ICU stay (12.6 vs 26 days; p = 0.000) and mechanical ventilation use (14.2 days vs 22.4 days; p = 0.000) compared to non-ECMO group. Also, there was a high number of patients with septic shock (19.6%) and multiple organ failure (10.9%); and more complications occurred at any time during hospitalization [pneumothorax (5% vs 29.3%, p = 0.000), bleeding requiring blood transfusion (7.1% vs 38%, p = 0.000), pulmonary embolism (6.4% vs 15.2%, p = 0.016), and gastrointestinal bleeding (3.3% vs 8.7%, p = 0.017)] in the ECMO group. However, PaO2 was significantly higher in the 72-h post-ECMO initiation group and PCO2 was significantly lower in the 72-h post-ECMO start group than those in the 12-h pre-ECMO group (62.9 vs. 70 mmHg, p = 0.002 and 61.8 vs. 51 mmHg, p = 0.042, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

Following the use of ECMO, the mortality rate of patients and length of ICU and hospital stay were not improved. However, these findings need to be carefully interpreted, as most of our cohort patients were relatively old and had multiple severe comorbidities. Future randomized trials, although challenging to conduct, are highly needed to confirm or dispute reported observations.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Critical Illness / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Eur J Med Res Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S40001-021-00618-3

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Respiratory Distress Syndrome / Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation / Critical Illness / SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Eur J Med Res Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S40001-021-00618-3