Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Fusion of multi-scale bag of deep visual words features of chest X-ray images to detect COVID-19 infection.
Sitaula, Chiranjibi; Shahi, Tej Bahadur; Aryal, Sunil; Marzbanrad, Faezeh.
  • Sitaula C; Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia. Chiranjibi.Sitaula@monash.edu.
  • Shahi TB; School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, 4701, Australia.
  • Aryal S; Central Department of Computer Science and IT, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal.
  • Marzbanrad F; School of Information Technology, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC, 3216, Australia.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 23914, 2021 12 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1569278
ABSTRACT
Chest X-ray (CXR) images have been one of the important diagnosis tools used in the COVID-19 disease diagnosis. Deep learning (DL)-based methods have been used heavily to analyze these images. Compared to other DL-based methods, the bag of deep visual words-based method (BoDVW) proposed recently is shown to be a prominent representation of CXR images for their better discriminability. However, single-scale BoDVW features are insufficient to capture the detailed semantic information of the infected regions in the lungs as the resolution of such images varies in real application. In this paper, we propose a new multi-scale bag of deep visual words (MBoDVW) features, which exploits three different scales of the 4th pooling layer's output feature map achieved from VGG-16 model. For MBoDVW-based features, we perform the Convolution with Max pooling operation over the 4th pooling layer using three different kernels [Formula see text], [Formula see text], and [Formula see text]. We evaluate our proposed features with the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification algorithm on four CXR public datasets (CD1, CD2, CD3, and CD4) with over 5000 CXR images. Experimental results show that our method produces stable and prominent classification accuracy (84.37%, 88.88%, 90.29%, and 83.65% on CD1, CD2, CD3, and CD4, respectively).
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-021-03287-8

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Sci Rep Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41598-021-03287-8