Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Evaluation of Three Multiplex Real-time Reverse Transcription PCR Assays for Simultaneous Detection of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A/B, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Nasopharyngeal Swabs.
Yun, Jiwon; Park, Jae Hyeon; Kim, Namhee; Roh, Eun Youn; Shin, Sue; Yoon, Jong Hyun; Kim, Taek Soo; Park, Hyunwoong.
  • Yun J; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park JH; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim N; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • Roh EY; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • Shin S; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Yoon JH; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim TS; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park H; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci ; 36(48): e328, 2021 Dec 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1572278
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic era, the simultaneous detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza virus (Flu), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is important in the rapid differential diagnosis in patients with respiratory symptoms. Three multiplex real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) assays have been recently developed commercially in Korea PowerChek™ SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A&B Multiplex Real-time PCR Kit (PowerChek; KogeneBiotech); STANDARD™ M Flu/SARS-CoV-2 Real-time Detection Kit (STANDARD M; SD BioSensor); and Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2/FluA/FluB/RSV Assay (Allplex; Seegene). We evaluated the analytical and clinical performances of these kits.

METHODS:

A limit of detection tests were performed and cross-reactivity analysis was executed using clinical respiratory samples. Ninety-seven SARS-CoV-2-positive, 201 SARS-CoV-2-negative, 71 influenza A-positive, 50 influenza B-positive, 78 RSV-positive, and 207 other respiratory virus-positive nasopharyngeal swabs were tested using the three assays. The AdvanSure™ respiratory viruses rRT-PCR assay (AdvanSure; LG Life Sciences) was used as a comparator assay for RSV.

RESULTS:

Except in influenza B, in SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A, there were no significant differences in detecting specific genes of the viruses among the three assays. All three kits did not cross-react with common respiratory viruses. All three kits had greater than 92% positive percent agreement and negative percent agreement and ≥ 0.95 kappa value in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 and flu A/B. Allplex detected RSV more sensitively than AdvanSure.

CONCLUSION:

The overall performance of three multiplex rRT-PCR assays for the concurrent detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and RSV was comparable. These kits will promote prompt differential diagnosis of COVID-19, influenza, and RSV infection in the COVID-19 pandemic era.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: RNA, Viral / Nasopharynx / Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections / Influenza, Human / Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: J Korean Med Sci Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: RNA, Viral / Nasopharynx / Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections / Influenza, Human / Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: J Korean Med Sci Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article