Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Performance of at-home self-collected saliva and nasal-oropharyngeal swabs in the surveillance of COVID-19.
Braz-Silva, Paulo H; Mamana, Ana C; Romano, Camila M; Felix, Alvina C; de Paula, Anderson V; Fereira, Noeli E; Buss, Lewis F; Tozetto-Mendoza, Tania R; Caixeta, Rafael A V; Leal, Fabio E; Grespan, Regina M Z; Bizário, João C S; Ferraz, Andrea B C; Sapkota, Dipak; Giannecchini, Simone; To, Kelvin K; Doglio, Alain; Mendes-Correa, Maria C.
  • Braz-Silva PH; Laboratory of Virology (LIM-52), Institute of Tropical Medicine of São Paulo, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Mamana AC; Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Romano CM; Laboratory of Virology (LIM-52), Institute of Tropical Medicine of São Paulo, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Felix AC; Laboratory of Virology (LIM-52), Institute of Tropical Medicine of São Paulo, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Paula AV; Laboratory of Virology (LIM-52), Institute of Tropical Medicine of São Paulo, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Fereira NE; Laboratory of Virology (LIM-52), Institute of Tropical Medicine of São Paulo, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Buss LF; Laboratory of Virology (LIM-52), Institute of Tropical Medicine of São Paulo, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Tozetto-Mendoza TR; Laboratory of Virology (LIM-52), Institute of Tropical Medicine of São Paulo, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Caixeta RAV; Laboratory of Virology (LIM-52), Institute of Tropical Medicine of São Paulo, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Leal FE; Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Grespan RMZ; Department of Medicine, Municipal University of São Caetano do Sul, São Caetano Do Sul, Brazil.
  • Bizário JCS; Department of Medicine, Municipal University of São Caetano do Sul, São Caetano Do Sul, Brazil.
  • Ferraz ABC; Department of Medicine, Municipal University of São Caetano do Sul, São Caetano Do Sul, Brazil.
  • Sapkota D; Department of Medicine, Municipal University of São Caetano do Sul, São Caetano Do Sul, Brazil.
  • Giannecchini S; Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • To KK; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Doglio A; State Key Laboratory for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Department of Microbiology, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Li KaShing Faculty of Medicine of the University of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, China.
  • Mendes-Correa MC; Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
J Oral Microbiol ; 13(1): 1858002, 2020 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1573905
ABSTRACT

Background:

SARS-CoV-2 quickly spreads in the worldwide population, imposing social restrictions to control the infection, being the massive testing another essential strategy to break the chain of transmission.

Aim:

To compare the performance of at-home self-collected samples - saliva and combined nasal-oropharyngeal swabs (NOP) - for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a telemedicine platform for COVID-19 surveillance. Material and

methods:

We analyzed 201 patients who met the criteria of suspected COVID-19. NOP sampling was combined (nostrils and oropharynx) and saliva collected using a cotton pad device. Detection of SARS-COV-2 was performed by using the Altona RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kit 1.0. 

Results:

There was an overall significant agreement (κ coefficient value of 0.58) between saliva and NOP. Considering results in either sample, 70 patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 were identified, with 52/70 being positive in NOP and 55/70 in saliva. This corresponds to sensitivities of 74.2% (95% CI; 63.7% to 83.1%) for NOP and 78.6% (95% CI; 67.6% to 86.6%) for saliva.

Conclusion:

Our data show the feasibility of using at-home self-collected samples (especially saliva), as an adequate alternative for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This new approach of testing can be useful to develop strategies for COVID-19 surveillance and for guiding public health decisions.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Language: English Journal: J Oral Microbiol Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 20002297.2020.1858002

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Language: English Journal: J Oral Microbiol Year: 2020 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 20002297.2020.1858002