Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Bibliometric Study of Scientific Productivity on the Impacts on Mental Health in Times of Pandemic.
Caballero-Apaza, Luz Marina; Vidal-Espinoza, Rubén; Curaca-Arroyo, Silvia; Gomez-Campos, Rossana; Callata-Gallegos, Zaida; Fuentes-López, José; Cossio-Bolaños, Marco.
  • Caballero-Apaza LM; Escuela Profesional de Enfermería, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno, Puno 21001, Peru.
  • Vidal-Espinoza R; Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación (IICE), Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno, Puno 21001, Peru.
  • Curaca-Arroyo S; Facultad de Educación, Universidad Católica Silva Henriquez, Santiago 8330225, Chile.
  • Gomez-Campos R; Escuela Profesional de Enfermería, Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno, Puno 21001, Peru.
  • Callata-Gallegos Z; Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación (IICE), Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno, Puno 21001, Peru.
  • Fuentes-López J; Departamento de Diversidad e Inclusividad Educativa, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3466706, Chile.
  • Cossio-Bolaños M; Instituto de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación (IICE), Universidad Nacional del Altiplano de Puno, Puno 21001, Peru.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(1)2021 Dec 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1580584
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

The presence of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus is causing enormous threats to people's health and lives, so quantifying the scientific productivity on mental health in times of pandemic is an urgent need, especially to expand the degree of knowledge on mental health problems in regions of low scientific productivity. The aim was to characterize the bibliometric indicators of scientific productivity on mental health during the pandemic in the PubMed Identifier database of the National Library of Medicine in the United States. Materials and

Methods:

A documentary study (bibliometric) of the scientific productivity on mental health in times of pandemic from January 2020 to June 2021 was carried out. The PubMed database was used to abstract the information from the original scientific articles. The data abstracted were authors, year of publication, journal name, country, and language of publication.

Results:

We identified 47 original articles worldwide, which were published in 29 journals and in three languages (English, Spanish, and German). We observed three groups of countries that published on mental health topics. The first group comprised the largest number of publications, which were multicenter studies (six studies), followed by India (five studies), and Italy (four studies). A second group comprised Bangladesh, China, USA, and Spain, with 3 studies each; and a third group comprised 13 countries (Albania, Saudi Arabia, Argentina, Brazil, South Korea, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Greece, Japan, Jordan, Kuwait, and New Zealand) with one study each.

Conclusions:

Bibliometric indicators of scientific productivity on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic have ostensibly increased. We verified 47 studies in PubMed, which could serve to improve the understanding and management of COVID-19, as well as serve as a thought-provoking means for other countries and researchers to publish on the state of mental health during and post pandemic.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biomedical Research / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Medicina58010024

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biomedical Research / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal subject: Medicine Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Medicina58010024