Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Predictive validity of A-level grades and teacher-predicted grades in UK medical school applicants: a retrospective analysis of administrative data in a time of COVID-19.
McManus, I C; Woolf, Katherine; Harrison, David; Tiffin, Paul A; Paton, Lewis W; Cheung, Kevin Yet Fong; Smith, Daniel T.
  • McManus IC; Research Department of Medical Education, UCL Medical School, London, UK i.mcmanus@ucl.ac.uk.
  • Woolf K; Research Department of Medical Education, UCL Medical School, London, UK.
  • Harrison D; Research Department of Medical Education, UCL Medical School, London, UK.
  • Tiffin PA; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
  • Paton LW; Health Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK.
  • Cheung KYF; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
  • Smith DT; Cambridge Assessment, Cambridge, UK.
BMJ Open ; 11(12): e047354, 2021 12 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1583120
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare in UK medical students the predictive validity of attained A-level grades and teacher-predicted A levels for undergraduate and postgraduate outcomes. Teacher-predicted A-level grades are a plausible proxy for the teacher-estimated grades that replaced UK examinations in 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study also models the likely future consequences for UK medical schools of replacing public A-level examination grades with teacher-predicted grades.

DESIGN:

Longitudinal observational study using UK Medical Education Database data.

SETTING:

UK medical education and training.

PARTICIPANTS:

Dataset 1 81 202 medical school applicants in 2010-2018 with predicted and attained A-level grades. Dataset 2 22 150 18-year-old medical school applicants in 2010-2014 with predicted and attained A-level grades, of whom 12 600 had medical school assessment outcomes and 1340 had postgraduate outcomes available. OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Undergraduate and postgraduate medical examination results in relation to attained and teacher-predicted A-level results.

RESULTS:

Dataset 1 teacher-predicted grades were accurate for 48.8% of A levels, overpredicted in 44.7% of cases and underpredicted in 6.5% of cases. Dataset 2 undergraduate and postgraduate outcomes correlated significantly better with attained than with teacher-predicted A-level grades. Modelling suggests that using teacher-estimated grades instead of attained grades will mean that 2020 entrants are more likely to underattain compared with previous years, 13% more gaining the equivalent of the lowest performance decile and 16% fewer reaching the equivalent of the current top decile, with knock-on effects for postgraduate training.

CONCLUSIONS:

The replacement of attained A-level examination grades with teacher-estimated grades as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic may result in 2020 medical school entrants having somewhat lower academic performance compared with previous years. Medical schools may need to consider additional teaching for entrants who are struggling or who might need extra support for missed aspects of A-level teaching.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Medical / Education, Medical, Undergraduate / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: BMJOPEN-2020-047354

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Medical / Education, Medical, Undergraduate / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: BMJOPEN-2020-047354