Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 amongst ophthalmologists throughout the first and second waves of the pandemic.
Sacchi, Matteo; Lizzio, Rosario Alfio Umberto; Villani, Edoardo; Tagliabue, Elena; Monsellato, Gianluca; Pajardi, Giorgio; Luccarelli, Saverio; Nucci, Paolo.
  • Sacchi M; Eye Clinic, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy.
  • Lizzio RAU; Eye Clinic, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy.
  • Villani E; Eye Clinic, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy.
  • Tagliabue E; Department of Clinical Science and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Monsellato G; Value-based Healthcare Unit, IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy.
  • Pajardi G; Eye Clinic, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy.
  • Luccarelli S; Plastic and Hand Surgery Clinic, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy.
  • Nucci P; Eye Clinic, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Milan, Italy.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(50): e28192, 2021 Dec 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1583958
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT The study aims to investigate the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among ophthalmology unit staff throughout the first and second waves of the outbreak, in order to verify the effectiveness of the measures adopted in containing the contagion.A retrospective observational study was conducted involving staff members, who received a naso/oropharyngeal swab when complaining of SARS-CoV-2 symptoms and once a month as a screening measure. They were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies as a screening measure during the first and the second wave. Clinical activities performed during the outbreak were compared with those performed during the same period in 2019 and correlated with the number of coronavirus disease-2019 eye care workers.Analysis included 25 workers. Clinical infection was 0% and 12% whereas the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies ranged from 4% to 8% in the first and second wave, respectively. The increase in the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection between the first and the second wave was not significant (1/25 vs 3/25, P = .6092). Clinical activities significantly decreased during the first wave compared with the same period in 2019 (3256 vs 10,075, P < .0001, -68% to 2019), but increased during the second wave (8208 vs 3256, P < .0001, +152% to the first wave).Despite the increase in routine activities during the second wave, we did not observe a significant increase in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence. Strict protection measures seemed to contain the rate of contagion among the ophthalmology unit members even in a high-volume clinical setting in one of the most affected area by the coronavirus disease-2019 outbreak.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmologists / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Md.0000000000028192

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmologists / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Md.0000000000028192