Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Experience of the first 1127 COVID-19 Vaccine Allergy Safety patients in Hong Kong - Clinical outcomes, barriers to vaccination, and urgency for reform.
Chiang, Valerie; Mok, Sabrina Wing Shan; Chan, June King Chi; Leung, Wai Yan; Ho, Carmen Tze Kwan; Au, Elaine Y L; Lau, Chak Sing; Lee, Tak Hong; Li, Philip Hei.
  • Chiang V; Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
  • Mok SWS; Allergy Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
  • Chan JKC; Allergy Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
  • Leung WY; Division of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Ho CTK; Division of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Au EYL; Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
  • Lau CS; Division of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Lee TH; Allergy Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
  • Li PH; Division of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
World Allergy Organ J ; 15(1): 100622, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1586263
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Hong Kong has had a low incidence of COVID-19 vaccine related anaphylaxis, partly due to its Vaccine Allergy Safety (VAS) guidelines for screening those at higher risk of COVID-19 vaccine-associated allergic reactions. We characterize the initial experience of the VAS clinics, as well as the impact of unnecessary referrals to the vaccination program.

METHODS:

All patients attending the VAS Clinics of the public and private health services between February and June 2021 were reviewed.

RESULTS:

Out of 1127 patients assessed at VAS clinics, 1102 (97.8%) patients were recommended for vaccination. Out of those contacted, more than 80% (450/558) received vaccination successfully; the remaining had not yet booked their vaccinations. The majority (87.5%) of patients not recommended was due to potential excipient allergies. Males were significantly more likely to be recommended (OR = 5.822, 95% CI = 1.361-24.903, p = 0.007), but no other features were associated with recommendation for vaccination. Almost half (45.1%) of public service referrals were rejected due to insufficient information or incorrect indications for referral. The majority of cases (56.2%) of patients referred for suspected "anaphylaxis" did not fulfil diagnostic criteria.

DISCUSSION:

COVID-19 vaccination is very safe and 98% of high-risk patients were recommended for vaccination. Barriers to VAS include a high proportion of inappropriate referrals, inaccurate diagnoses of anaphylaxis and inability to diagnose excipient allergies. Our data validates that a prior history of COVID-vaccine unrelated anaphylaxis should be removed as a precaution for vaccination. Closer collaborations between primary care and allergy specialists and changes in pharmaceutical legislation should be made a priority to promote vaccination uptake.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Language: English Journal: World Allergy Organ J Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.waojou.2021.100622

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Language: English Journal: World Allergy Organ J Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.waojou.2021.100622