Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Staff perceptions of COVID-19 impacts on wildlife conservation at a zoological institution.
Fine, Leah; Barnes, Carolyn; Niedbalski, Amy; Deem, Sharon L.
  • Fine L; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Barnes C; Saint Louis Zoo, Institute for Conservation Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Niedbalski A; Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
  • Deem SL; Saint Louis Zoo, Conservation Audience Research and Evaluation, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Zoo Biol ; 41(3): 234-243, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1588863
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has impacted virtually all aspects of a global society. By using a transdisciplinary team and methodology, our study highlights the importance of utilizing a One Health approach to address global health and conservation challenges in tandem. We examined how conservation conducted by an accredited zoological institution was altered by the pandemic. In July 2020, we surveyed a select subset of Saint Louis Zoo employees to understand how these staff members perceived their conservation work to be affected during this time. Additionally, in November and December 2020, seven survey respondents were interviewed virtually for qualitative data. Our hypothesis was that lack of funding, reduced ability to travel, and shifting priorities among conservation professionals, as well as their respective institutions, would be significant barriers to conservation efforts. Our survey results revealed that the top three perceived challenges to conservation projects at the Saint Louis Zoo due to the COVID-19 pandemic were lack of funding (83.9%), reductions in Zoo visitors (56.3%), and inability/lack of ability to access field sites and laboratories (55.2%). Respondents also indicated that the top three most important Zoo conservation activities before the COVID-19 pandemic were (1) local/national/global wildlife management and recovery programs, (tie 2) caring for animals in the Zoo's collection, and (tie 2) genetic breeding programs. At least half of respondents indicated that the pandemic had significantly or slightly decreased the ability of staff to perform all three activities. Results supported our hypothesis that reduced funding, limited travel, and shifting priorities were challenges to zoological conservation at this institution. Although travel restrictions will likely persist, continual funding will be critical for maintaining conservation. Our results also indicate that reductions in Zoo visitors were another perceived barrier to conservation and that staff needed to find novel ways to connect with the public. Results from this study may help zoos and aquariums better understand the unique pandemic-associated challenges that threaten conservation at their institutions and may be helpful in designing programs and projects in a post-pandemic world.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Animals, Zoo Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Zoo Biol Journal subject: Biology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Zoo.21669

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Animals, Zoo Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research Limits: Animals Language: English Journal: Zoo Biol Journal subject: Biology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Zoo.21669