Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Sex and Gender-Related Differences in COVID-19 Diagnoses and SARS-CoV-2 Testing Practices During the First Wave of the Pandemic: The Dutch Lifelines COVID-19 Cohort Study.
Ballering, Aranka Viviënne; Oertelt-Prigione, Sabine; Olde Hartman, Tim C; Rosmalen, Judith G M.
  • Ballering AV; Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), University Medical Center of Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Oertelt-Prigione S; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Olde Hartman TC; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Rosmalen JGM; Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), University Medical Center of Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 30(12): 1686-1692, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1591509
ABSTRACT

Background:

Although sex differences are described in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnoses and testing, many studies neglect possible gender-related influences. Additionally, research is often performed in clinical populations, while most COVID-19 patients are not hospitalized. Therefore, we investigated associations between sex and gender-related variables, and COVID-19 diagnoses and testing practices in a large general population cohort during the first wave of the pandemic when testing capacity was limited.

Methods:

We used data from the Lifelines COVID-19 Cohort (N = 74,722; 60.8% female). We applied bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses. The outcomes were a COVID-19 diagnosis (confirmed by SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing or physician's clinical diagnosis) and PCR testing. Independent variables included among others participants' sex, age, somatic comorbidities, occupation, and smoking status. Sex-by-comorbidity and sex-by-occupation interaction terms were included to investigate sex differences in associations between the presence of comorbidities or an occupation with COVID-19 diagnoses or testing practices.

Results:

In bivariate analyses female sex was significantly associated with COVID-19 diagnoses and testing, but significance did not persist in multiple logistic regression analyses. However, a gender-related variable, being a health care worker, was significantly associated with COVID-19 diagnoses (OR = 1.68; 95%CI = 1.30-2.17) and testing (OR = 12.5; 95%CI = 8.55-18.3). Female health care workers were less often diagnosed and tested than male health care workers (ORinteraction = 0.54; 95%CI = 0.32-0.92, ORinteraction = 0.53; 95%CI = 0.29-0.97, respectively).

Conclusions:

We found no sex differences in COVID-19 diagnoses and testing in the general population. Among health care workers, a male preponderance in COVID-19 diagnoses and testing was observed. This could be explained by more pronounced COVID-19 symptoms in males or by gender inequities.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Journal subject: Gynecology / Women's Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jwh.2021.0226

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Journal subject: Gynecology / Women's Health Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jwh.2021.0226