June–September 2021
Ecclesiastical Law Journal
; 24(1):96-100, 2022.
Article
in English
| ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1592548
ABSTRACT
Though public policy continued to be dominated by the COVID-19 pandemic, restrictions began to ease as the vaccine rollout progressed. The volume of secondary legislation barely slackened, however, and the lack of parliamentary scrutiny was a cause of concern both to academic commentators and to parliamentarians. On 10 June, the House of Lords Constitution Committee published its third and final report on the constitutional implications of coronavirus and was clearly very unhappy with the course of events ‘The Government has introduced a large volume of new legislation, much of it transforming everyday life and introducing unprecedented restrictions on ordinary activities. Yet parliamentary oversight of these significant policy decisions has been extremely limited.’
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Databases of international organizations
Database:
ProQuest Central
Language:
English
Journal:
Ecclesiastical Law Journal
Year:
2022
Document Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS