Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) in a FAIR Metadata Registry for COVID-19 Research.
Klopfenstein, Sophie Anne Ines; Vorisek, Carina Nina; Shutsko, Aliaksandra; Lehne, Moritz; Sass, Julian; Löbe, Matthias; Schmidt, Carsten Oliver; Thun, Sylvia.
  • Klopfenstein SAI; Core Facility Digital Medicine and Interoperability, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
  • Vorisek CN; Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
  • Shutsko A; Core Facility Digital Medicine and Interoperability, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
  • Lehne M; ZB MED - Information Centre for Life Sciences, Germany.
  • Sass J; Core Facility Digital Medicine and Interoperability, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
  • Löbe M; Core Facility Digital Medicine and Interoperability, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
  • Schmidt CO; Institute for Medical Informatics (IMISE), University of Leipzig, Germany.
  • Thun S; Institute of Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 287: 73-77, 2021 11 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1594908
ABSTRACT
Adopting international standards within health research communities can elevate data FAIRness and widen analysis possibilities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mapping feasibility against HL7® Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources® (FHIR)® of a generic metadata schema (MDS) created for a central search hub gathering COVID-19 health research (studies, questionnaires, documents = MDS resource types). Mapping results were rated by calculating the percentage of FHIR coverage. Among 86 items to map, total mapping coverage was 94% 50 (58%) of the items were available as standard resources in FHIR and 31 (36%) could be mapped using extensions. Five items (6%) could not be mapped to FHIR. Analyzing each MDS resource type, there was a total mapping coverage of 93% for studies and 95% for questionnaires and documents, with 61% of the MDS items available as standard resources in FHIR for studies, 57% for questionnaires and 52% for documents. Extensions in studies, questionnaires and documents were used in 32%, 38% and 43% of items, respectively. This work shows that FHIR can be used as a standardized format in registries for clinical, epidemiological and public health research. However, further adjustments to the initial MDS are recommended - and two additional items even needed when implementing FHIR. Developing a MDS based on the FHIR standard could be a future approach to reduce data ambiguity and foster interoperability.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Metadata / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Journal subject: Medical Informatics / Health Services Research Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Shti210817

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Metadata / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Journal subject: Medical Informatics / Health Services Research Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Shti210817