Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Barriers and facilitators to engagement with artificial intelligence (AI)-based chatbots for sexual and reproductive health advice: a qualitative analysis.
Nadarzynski, Tom; Puentes, Vannesa; Pawlak, Izabela; Mendes, Tania; Montgomery, Ian; Bayley, Jake; Ridge, Damien.
  • Nadarzynski T; School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK.
  • Puentes V; Science, Engineering and Computing Faculty, Kingston University, London, UK.
  • Pawlak I; School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK.
  • Mendes T; School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK.
  • Montgomery I; Positive East, London, UK.
  • Bayley J; Barts NHS Trust, London, UK.
  • Ridge D; School of Social Sciences, University of Westminster, London, UK.
Sex Health ; 18(5): 385-393, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1596308
ABSTRACT
Background The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) provides opportunities for demand management of sexual and reproductive health services. Conversational agents/chatbots are increasingly common, although little is known about how this technology could aid services. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators for engagement with sexual health chatbots to advise service developers and related health professionals. Methods In January-June 2020, we conducted face-to-face, semi-structured and online interviews to explore views on sexual health chatbots. Participants were asked to interact with a chatbot, offering advice on sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and relevant services. Participants were UK-based and recruited via social media. Data were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Results Forty participants (aged 18-50 years; 64% women, 77% heterosexual, 58% white) took part. Many thought chatbots could aid sex education, providing useful information about STIs and sign-posting to sexual health services in a convenient, anonymous and non-judgemental way. Some compared chatbots to health professionals or Internet search engines and perceived this technology as inferior, offering constrained content and interactivity, limiting disclosure of personal information, trust and perceived accuracy of chatbot responses. Conclusions Despite mixed attitudes towards chatbots, this technology was seen as useful for anonymous sex education but less suitable for matters requiring empathy. Chatbots may increase access to clinical services but their effectiveness and safety need to be established. Future research should identify which chatbots designs and functions lead to optimal engagement with this innovation.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Reproductive Health Services / Sexual Health Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Sex Health Journal subject: Sexually Transmitted Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: SH21123

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Reproductive Health Services / Sexual Health Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged / Young adult Language: English Journal: Sex Health Journal subject: Sexually Transmitted Diseases Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: SH21123