Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Audience of Academic Otolaryngology on Twitter: Cross-sectional Study.
Xie, Deborah X; Boss, Emily F; Stewart, C Matthew.
  • Xie DX; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Boss EF; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
  • Stewart CM; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.
JMIR Med Educ ; 7(4): e25654, 2021 Dec 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1599308
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite the ubiquity of social media, the utilization and audience reach of this communication method by otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) residency programs has not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the content posted to a popular social media platform (Twitter) by OHNS residency programs.

METHODS:

In this cross-sectional study, we identified Twitter accounts for accredited academic OHNS residency programs. Tweets published over a 6-month period (March to August 2019) were extracted. Tweets were categorized and analyzed for source (original versus retweet) and target audience (medical versus layman). A random sample of 100 tweets was used to identify patterns of content, which were then used to categorize additional tweets. We quantified the total number of likes or retweets by health care professionals.

RESULTS:

Of the 121 accredited programs, 35 (28.9%) had Twitter accounts. Of the 2526 tweets in the 6-month period, 1695 (67.10%) were original-content tweets. The majority of tweets (1283/1695, 75.69%) were targeted toward health care workers, most of which did not directly contain medical information (954/1283, 74.36%). These tweets contained information about the department's trainees and education (349/954, 36.6%), participation at conferences (263/954, 27.6%), and research publications (112/954, 11.7%). Two-thirds of all tweets did not contain medical information. Medical professionals accounted for 1249/1362 (91.70%) of retweets and 5616/6372 (88.14%) of likes on original-content tweets.

CONCLUSIONS:

The majority of Twitter usage by OHNS residency programs is for intra and interprofessional communication, and only a minority of tweets contain information geared toward the public. Communication and information sharing with patients is not the focus of OHNS departments on Twitter.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: JMIR Med Educ Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 25654

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: JMIR Med Educ Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 25654