Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Relation of corona-specific health literacy to use of and trust in information sources during the COVID-19 pandemic.
De Gani, Saskia Maria; Berger, Fabian Marc Pascal; Guggiari, Elena; Jaks, Rebecca.
  • De Gani SM; Careum Foundation, Health Literacy Department, Pestalozzistrasse 3, 8032, Zurich, CH, Switzerland. saskia.degani@careum.ch.
  • Berger FMP; Careum Foundation, Health Literacy Department, Pestalozzistrasse 3, 8032, Zurich, CH, Switzerland.
  • Guggiari E; Careum School of Health, Research Departmen, Gloriastrasse 18a, 8006, Zurich, CH, Switzerland.
  • Jaks R; Careum Foundation, Health Literacy Department, Pestalozzistrasse 3, 8032, Zurich, CH, Switzerland.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 42, 2022 01 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1613230
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

COVID-19 has developed into a worldwide pandemic which was accompanied by an «infodemic¼ consisting of much false and misleading information. To cope with these new challenges, health literacy plays an essential role. The aim of this paper is to present the findings of a trend study in Switzerland on corona-specific health literacy, the use of and trust in information sources during the COVID-19 pandemic, and their relationships.

METHODS:

Three online surveys each with approximately 1'020 individuals living in the German-speaking part of Switzerland (age ≥ 18 years) were conducted at different timepoints during the COVID-19 pandemic, namely spring, fall and winter 2020. For the assessment of corona-specific health literacy, a specifically developed instrument (HLS-COVID-Q22) was used. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate data analyses have been conducted.

RESULTS:

In general, a majority of the Swiss-German population reported sufficient corona-specific health literacy levels which increased during the pandemic 54.6% participants in spring, 62.4% in fall and 63.3% in winter 2020 had sufficient corona-specific health literacy. Greatest difficulties concerned the appraisal of health information on the coronavirus. The most used information sources were television (used by 73.3% in spring, 70% in fall and 72.3% in winter) and the internet (used by 64.1, 64.8 and 66.5%). Although health professionals, health authorities and the info-hotline were rarely mentioned as sources for information on the coronavirus, respondents had greatest trust in them. On the other hand, social media were considered as the least trustworthy information sources. Respondents generally reporting more trust in the various information sources, tended to have higher corona-specific health literacy levels.

CONCLUSIONS:

Sufficient health literacy is an essential prerequisite for finding, understanding, appraising, and applying health recommendations, particularly in a situation where there is a rapid spread of a huge amount of information. The population should be supported in their capability in appraising the received information and in assessing the trustworthiness of different information sources.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Literacy / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adolescent / Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Public Health Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12889-021-12271-w

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Health Literacy / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adolescent / Humans Language: English Journal: BMC Public Health Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12889-021-12271-w