Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: two-wave Scottish cohort study.
De Kock, Johannes H; Ann Latham, Helen; Cowden, Richard G; Cullen, Breda; Narzisi, Katia; Jerdan, Shaun; Muñoz, Sarah-Anne; Leslie, Stephen J; McNamara, Neil; Boggon, Adam; Humphry, Roger W.
  • De Kock JH; Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands; and Department of Clinical Psychology, New Craigs Psychiatric Hospital, NHS Highland, UK.
  • Ann Latham H; Nairn Healthcare Group, NHS Highland, UK.
  • Cowden RG; Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, USA.
  • Cullen B; Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK.
  • Narzisi K; Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, UK.
  • Jerdan S; Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, UK.
  • Muñoz SA; Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands, UK.
  • Leslie SJ; Institute for Health Research and Innovation, University of the Highlands and Islands; and Cardiac Unit, Raigmore Hospital, NHS Highland, UK.
  • McNamara N; Department of Psychiatry, New Craigs Psychiatric Hospital, NHS Highland, UK.
  • Boggon A; University College London Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, UK.
  • Humphry RW; Epidemiology Research Unit, Scottish Rural College, UK.
BJPsych Open ; 8(1): e23, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1613268
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Health and social care workers (HSCWs) are at risk of experiencing adverse mental health outcomes (e.g. higher levels of anxiety and depression) because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This can have a detrimental effect on quality of care, the national response to the pandemic and its aftermath.

AIMS:

A longitudinal design provided follow-up evidence on the mental health (changes in prevalence of disease over time) of NHS staff working at a remote health board in Scotland during the COVID-19 pandemic, and investigated the determinants of mental health outcomes over time.

METHOD:

A two-wave longitudinal study was conducted from July to September 2020. Participants self-reported levels of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7) and mental well-being (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale) at baseline and 1.5 months later.

RESULTS:

The analytic sample of 169 participants, working in community (43%) and hospital (44%) settings, reported substantial levels of depression and anxiety, and low mental well-being at baseline (depression, 30.8%; anxiety, 20.1%; well-being, 31.9%). Although mental health remained mostly constant over time, the proportion of participants meeting the threshold for anxiety increased to 27.2% at follow-up. Multivariable modelling indicated that working with, and disruption because of, COVID-19 were associated with adverse mental health changes over time.

CONCLUSIONS:

HSCWs working in a remote area with low COVID-19 prevalence reported substantial levels of anxiety and depression, similar to those working in areas with high COVID-19 prevalence. Efforts to support HSCW mental health must remain a priority, and should minimise the adverse effects of working with, and disruption caused by, the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: BJPsych Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bjo.2021.1079

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: BJPsych Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bjo.2021.1079