Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Perceptions and opinions of Nigerians to the management and response to COVID-19 in Nigeria.
Oleribe, Obinna Ositadimma; Idigbe, Ifeoma Eugenia; Osita-Oleribe, Princess; Olawepo, Olatayo; Musa, Zaidat Adesola; Aikhuomogbe, Samuel; Ezechi, Oliver Chukwujekwu; Fertleman, Michael; Salako, Babatunde; Taylor-Robinson, Simon David.
  • Oleribe OO; Family Services Department, Klamath Tribal Health and Family Services, Klamath Falls, Oregon, United States of America.
  • Idigbe IE; Department of Public Health, Nigeria Institute for Medical Research, PMB 2013, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.
  • Osita-Oleribe P; Office of the Director, Center for Family Health Initiative, Kubwa, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Olawepo O; Office of the Central Secretariat, Georgetown Global Health, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Musa ZA; Department of Public Health, Nigeria Institute for Medical Research, PMB 2013, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.
  • Aikhuomogbe S; Baobab Group, 360, Murtala Muhammed Way, Yaba, Lagos 2013, Nigeria.
  • Ezechi OC; Office of the Central Secretariat, Nigeria Institute for Medical Research, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.
  • Fertleman M; Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, White City Campus, 86 Wood Lane, London W120BZ, United Kingdom.
  • Salako B; Office of the Director General, Nigeria Institute for Medical Research, PMB 2013, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.
  • Taylor-Robinson SD; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London W21NY, United Kingdom.
Pan Afr Med J ; 40: 185, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1614294
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

we present a qualitative analysis of opinions of the Nigerian general public as to how successful healthcare strategies have been in containing the COVID-19 outbreak.

METHODS:

an online qualitative survey was conducted, consisting of 30 semi-structured questions.

RESULTS:

four hundred and ninety-five (495) respondents participated, ranging in age from 18 to 59 years. Over 40% of all respondents were critical of public health information. Participants saw provision of social support measures (n = 83), lack of economic, financial and social support (n = 65), enforcement of restrictions on movement outside the home, availability of face-masks and social distancing (n = 53) and provision of COVID-19 testing (n = 48) as the major things that were handled poorly by the government and health authorities.

CONCLUSION:

we advocate coordinated forward planning for public safety until vaccines are widely available; while social distancing should continue. Policymakers need to be adaptable to changing conditions, given fluctuating case numbers and fatality rates.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Qualitative research Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: Pan Afr Med J Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Pamj.2021.40.185.31824

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Qualitative research Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Humans / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: Pan Afr Med J Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Pamj.2021.40.185.31824