Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Variability in personal protective equipment in cross-sectional interventional abdominal radiology practices.
Planz, Virginia; Huang, Jennifer; Galgano, Samuel J; Brook, Olga R; Fananapazir, Ghaneh.
  • Planz V; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. virginia.planz@vumc.org.
  • Huang J; Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Galgano SJ; Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Brook OR; Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Fananapazir G; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 47(3): 1167-1176, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1616117
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To determine institutional practice requirements for personal protective equipment (PPE) in cross-sectional interventional radiology (CSIR) procedures among a variety of radiology practices in the USA and Canada.

METHODS:

Members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) CSIR Emerging Technology Commission (ETC) were sent an eight-question survey about what PPE they were required to use during common CSIR procedures paracentesis, thoracentesis, thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA), superficial lymph node biopsy, deep lymph node biopsy, solid organ biopsy, and ablation. Types of PPE evaluated were sterile gloves, surgical masks, gowns, surgical hats, eye shields, foot covers, and scrubs.

RESULTS:

26/38 surveys were completed by respondents at 20/22 (91%) institutions. The most common PPE was sterile gloves, required by 20/20 (100%) institutions for every procedure. The second most common PPE was masks, required by 14/20 (70%) institutions for superficial and deep procedures and 12/12 (100%) institutions for ablation. Scrubs, sterile gowns, eye shields, and surgical hats were required at nearly all institutions for ablation, whereas approximately half of institutions required their use for deep lymph node and solid organ biopsy. Compared with other types of PPE, required mask and eye shield use showed the greatest increase during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

CONCLUSION:

PPE use during common cross-sectional procedures is widely variable. Given the environmental and financial impact and lack of consensus practice, further studies examining the appropriate level of PPE are needed.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00261-021-03406-z

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Personal Protective Equipment / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S00261-021-03406-z