Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Human Research Study of Particulate Propagation Distance From Human Respiratory Function.
Reyes, Jonathan; Stiehl, Bernhard; Delgado, Juanpablo; Kinzel, Michael; Ahmed, Kareem.
  • Reyes J; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
  • Stiehl B; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
  • Delgado J; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
  • Kinzel M; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
  • Ahmed K; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
J Infect Dis ; 225(8): 1321-1329, 2022 04 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1621616
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Airborne viral pathogens like severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be encapsulated and transmitted through liquid droplets/aerosols formed during human respiratory events.

METHODS:

The number and extent of droplets/aerosols at distances between 1 and 6 ft (0.305-1.829 m) for a participant wearing no face covering, a cotton single-layer cloth face covering, and a 3-layer disposable face covering were measured for defined speech and cough events. The data include planar particle imagery to illuminate emissions by a light-sheet and local aerosol/droplet probes taken with phase Doppler interferometry and an aerodynamic particle sizer.

RESULTS:

Without face coverings, droplets/aerosols were detected up to a maximum of 1.25 m (4.1ft ±â€…0.22-0.28 ft) during speech and up to 1.37 m (4.5ft ±â€…0.19-0.33 ft) while coughing. The cloth face covering reduced maximum axial distances to 0.61 m (2.0 ft ±â€…0.11-0.15 ft) for speech and to 0.67 m (2.2 ft ±â€…0.02-0.20 ft) while coughing. Using the disposable face covering, safe distance was reduced further to 0.15 m (0.50 ft ±â€…0.01-0.03 ft) measured for both emission scenarios. In addition, the use of face coverings was highly effective in reducing the count of expelled aerosols.

CONCLUSIONS:

The experimental study indicates that 0.914 m (3 ft) physical distancing with face coverings is equally as effective at reducing aerosol/droplet exposure as 1.829 m (6 ft) with no face covering.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Infect Dis Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Infdis

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: J Infect Dis Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Infdis