Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Cash transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
Persaud, Navindra; Thorpe, Kevin E; Bedard, Michael; Hwang, Stephen W; Pinto, Andrew; Jüni, Peter; da Costa, Bruno R.
  • Persaud N; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada nav.persaud@utoronto.ca.
  • Thorpe KE; MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Bedard M; Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Hwang SW; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Pinto A; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Jüni P; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • da Costa BR; Applied Health Research Centre, Unity Health Toronto, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fam Med Community Health ; 9(4)2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1626835
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the effect of a one-time cash transfer of $C1000 in people who are unable to physically distance due to insufficient income.

DESIGN:

Open-label, multi-centre, randomised superiority trial.

SETTING:

Seven primary care sites in Ontario, Canada; six urban sites associated with St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto and one in Manitoulin Island.

PARTICIPANTS:

392 individuals who reported trouble affording basic necessities due to disruptions related to COVID-19. INTERVENTION After random allocation, participants either received the cash transfer of $C1000 (n=196) or physical distancing guidelines alone (n=196). MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

The primary outcome was the maximum number of symptoms consistent with COVID-19 over 14 days. Secondary outcomes were meeting clinical criteria for COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 presence, number of close contacts, general health and ability to afford basic necessities.

RESULTS:

The primary outcome of number of symptoms reported by participants did not differ between groups after 2 weeks (cash transfer, mean 1.6 vs 1.9, ratio of means 0.83; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.24). There were no statistically significant effects on secondary outcomes of the meeting COVID-19 clinical criteria (7.9% vs 12.8%; risk difference -0.05; 95% CI -0.11 to 0.01), SARS-CoV-2 presence (0.5% vs 0.6%; risk difference 0.00 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02), mean number of close contacts (3.5 vs 3.7; rate ratio 1.10; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.46), general health very good or excellent (60% vs 63%; risk difference -0.03 95% CI -0.14 to 0.08) and ability to make ends meet (52% vs 51%; risk difference 0.01 95% CI -0.10 to 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS:

A single cash transfer did not reduce the COVID-19 symptoms or improve the ability to afford necessities. Further studies are needed to determine whether some groups may benefit from financial supports and to determine if a higher level of support is beneficial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04359264.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fmch-2021-001452

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Year: 2021 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fmch-2021-001452