Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Quality improvement in a crisis: a qualitative study of experiences and lessons learned from the Irish National Ambulance Service response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Heffernan, Eithne; Keegan, Dylan; Clarke, Bridget; Deasy, Conor; O'Donnell, Cathal; Crowley, Philip; Hughes, Angela; Murphy, Andrew W; Masterson, Siobhán.
  • Heffernan E; Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland eithne.heffernan@nuigalway.ie.
  • Keegan D; Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
  • Clarke B; National Ambulance Service, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Deasy C; National Ambulance Service, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
  • O'Donnell C; Department of Emergency Medicine, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
  • Crowley P; Clinical Directorate, National Ambulance Service, Health Service Executive, Limerick, Ireland.
  • Hughes A; Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Murphy AW; Quality Improvement Division, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Masterson S; Discipline of General Practice, Clinical Science Institute, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.
BMJ Open ; 12(1): e057162, 2022 01 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1627486
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The COVID-19 pandemic has produced radical changes in international health services. In Ireland, the National Ambulance Service established a novel home and community testing service that was central to the national COVID-19 screening programme. This service was overseen by a multidisciplinary response room. This research examined the response room service, particularly areas that performed well and areas requiring improvement, using a quality improvement (QI) framework.

DESIGN:

This was a qualitative study comprising semi-structured, individual interviews. Maximum variation sampling was used. The data were analysed using an established thematic analysis procedure. The analysis was guided by the framework, which comprised six QI drivers.

SETTING:

Response room employees, including clinicians, dispatchers and administrators, were interviewed via telephone.

RESULTS:

Leadership for quality participants valued person-oriented leadership, including regular, open communication and consultation with staff. Person/family engagement participants endeavoured to provide patient-centred care. Formal patient feedback mechanisms and shared decision-making could be beneficial in the future. Staff engagement working in a response room could affect well-being, though it also provided networking and learning opportunities. Staff require support and teambuilding. Use of improvement

methods:

improvements were made in a relatively informal, ad hoc manner. The use of robust methods based on improvement science was not reported. Measurement for quality data were collected to improve efficiency and accuracy. More rigorous measurement would be beneficial, especially formally collecting stakeholder feedback. Governance for quality close alignment with collaborators and clear communication with staff are essential. Information and communications technology for quality this seventh driver was added because the importance of information technology specially designed for pandemics was frequently highlighted.

CONCLUSIONS:

The study provides insights on what worked well and what required improvement in a pandemic response room. It can inform health services, particularly emergency services, in their preparation for additional COVID-19 waves, as well as future crises.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-057162

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Qualitative research Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-057162