Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Adoption and continued use of mobile contact tracing technology: multilevel explanations from a three-wave panel survey and linked data.
Horvath, Laszlo; Banducci, Susan; Blamire, Joshua; Degnen, Cathrine; James, Oliver; Jones, Andrew; Stevens, Daniel; Tyler, Katharine.
  • Horvath L; Politics, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK L.Horvath@bbk.ac.uk.
  • Banducci S; Politics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
  • Blamire J; Politics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
  • Degnen C; Institute for Community Research and Development, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.
  • James O; School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
  • Jones A; Politics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
  • Stevens D; Faculty of Laws, UCL, London, UK.
  • Tyler K; Politics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
BMJ Open ; 12(1): e053327, 2022 01 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1627515
Preprint
This scientific journal article is probably based on a previously available preprint. It has been identified through a machine matching algorithm, human confirmation is still pending.
See preprint
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To identify the key individual-level (demographics, attitudes, mobility) and contextual (COVID-19 case numbers, tiers of mobility restrictions, urban districts) determinants of adopting the NHS COVID-19 contact tracing app and continued use overtime. DESIGN AND

SETTING:

A three-wave panel survey conducted in England in July 2020 (background survey), November 2020 (first measure of app adoption) and March 2021 (continued use of app and new adopters) linked with official data.

PARTICIPANTS:

N=2500 adults living in England, representative of England's population in terms of regional distribution, age and gender (2011 census). PRIMARY

OUTCOME:

Repeated measures of self-reported app usage. ANALYTICAL

APPROACH:

Multilevel logistic regression linking a range of individual level (from survey) and contextual (from linked data) determinants to app usage.

RESULTS:

We observe initial app uptake at 41%, 95% CI (0.39% to 0.43%), and a 12% drop-out rate by March 2021, 95% CI (0.10% to 0.14%). We also found that 7% of nonusers as of wave 2 became new adopters by wave 3, 95% CI (0.05% to 0.08%). Initial uptake (or failure to use) of the app associated with social norms, privacy concerns and misinformation about third-party data access, with those living in postal districts with restrictions on mobility less likely to use the app. Perceived lack of transparent evidence of effectiveness was associated with drop-out of use. In addition, those who trusted the government were more likely to adopt in wave 3 as new adopters.

CONCLUSIONS:

Successful uptake of the contact tracing app should be evaluated within the wider context of the UK Government's response to the crisis. Trust in government is key to adoption of the app in wave 3 while continued use is linked to perceptions of transparent evidence. Providing clear information to address privacy concerns could increase uptake, however, the disparities in continued use among ethnic minority participants needs further investigation.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mobile Applications / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-053327

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Mobile Applications / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2021-053327