Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Twitter and Facebook posts about COVID-19 are less likely to spread misinformation compared to other health topics.
Broniatowski, David A; Kerchner, Daniel; Farooq, Fouzia; Huang, Xiaolei; Jamison, Amelia M; Dredze, Mark; Quinn, Sandra Crouse; Ayers, John W.
  • Broniatowski DA; Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • Kerchner D; Institute for Data, Democracy and Politics, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • Farooq F; George Washington University Libraries, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
  • Huang X; Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
  • Jamison AM; Department of Computer Science, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States of America.
  • Dredze M; Department of Family Science, Center for Health Equity, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States of America.
  • Quinn SC; Department of Computer Science, Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
  • Ayers JW; Department of Family Science, Center for Health Equity, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States of America.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0261768, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1630639
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic brought widespread attention to an "infodemic" of potential health misinformation. This claim has not been assessed based on evidence. We evaluated if health misinformation became more common during the pandemic. We gathered about 325 million posts sharing URLs from Twitter and Facebook during the beginning of the pandemic (March 8-May 1, 2020) compared to the same period in 2019. We relied on source credibility as an accepted proxy for misinformation across this database. Human annotators also coded a subsample of 3000 posts with URLs for misinformation. Posts about COVID-19 were 0.37 times as likely to link to "not credible" sources and 1.13 times more likely to link to "more credible" sources than prior to the pandemic. Posts linking to "not credible" sources were 3.67 times more likely to include misinformation compared to posts from "more credible" sources. Thus, during the earliest stages of the pandemic, when claims of an infodemic emerged, social media contained proportionally less misinformation than expected based on the prior year. Our results suggest that widespread health misinformation is not unique to COVID-19. Rather, it is a systemic feature of online health communication that can adversely impact public health behaviors and must therefore be addressed.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Social Media / Disinformation Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0261768

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Social Media / Disinformation Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0261768