Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Prevention Research Centers and COVID-19: Models of a Community-Engaged Response to a Public Health Emergency.
Busse, Kyle R; Lemon, Stephenie C; Comerford, Beth P; Islam, Nadia S; Ulin, Brigette F; Eriksen, Michael P; Ammerman, Alice S.
  • Busse KR; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Lemon SC; Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  • Comerford BP; University of Massachusetts Worcester Prevention Research Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
  • Islam NS; Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
  • Ulin BF; Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center, Derby, CT, USA.
  • Eriksen MP; New York University-City University of New York Prevention Research Center, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Ammerman AS; Section for Health Equity, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Public Health Rep ; 137(2): 226-233, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1643027
ABSTRACT
For more than 30 years, the network of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-funded Prevention Research Centers (PRCs) has worked with local communities and partners to implement and evaluate public health interventions and policies for the prevention of disease and promotion of health. The COVID-19 pandemic tested the PRC network's ability to rapidly respond to multiple, simultaneous public health crises. On April 28, 2020, to assess the network's engagement with activities undertaken in response to the early phase of the pandemic, PRC network leadership distributed an online survey to the directors of 34 currently or formerly funded PRCs, asking them to report their PRCs' engagement with predetermined activities across 9 topical areas and provide case studies exemplifying that engagement. We received responses from 24 PRCs, all of which reported engagement with at least 1 of the 9 topical areas (mean, 5). The topical areas with which the greatest number of PRCs reported engagement were support of frontline agencies (21 of 24, 88%) and support of activities related to health care (21 of 24, 88%). The mean number of activities with which PRCs reported engagement was 11. The PRCs provided more than 90 case studies exemplifying their work. The results of the survey indicated that the PRCs mobilized their personnel and resources to support the COVID-19 response in less than 6 weeks. We posit that the speed of this response was due, in part, to the broad and diverse expertise of PRC personnel and long-standing partnerships between PRCs and the communities in which they work.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Preventive Health Services / Public Health / Community Participation / COVID-19 / Health Services Research Type of study: Case report / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Public Health Rep Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 00333549211059491

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Preventive Health Services / Public Health / Community Participation / COVID-19 / Health Services Research Type of study: Case report / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Public Health Rep Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 00333549211059491