Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Pneumonia Severity Index and CURB-65 Score Are Good Predictors of Mortality in Hospitalized Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Community-Acquired Pneumonia.
Bradley, James; Sbaih, Nadine; Chandler, Thomas R; Furmanek, Stephen; Ramirez, Julio A; Cavallazzi, Rodrigo.
  • Bradley J; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care Medicine, and Sleep Disorders, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
  • Sbaih N; Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
  • Chandler TR; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
  • Furmanek S; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
  • Ramirez JA; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
  • Cavallazzi R; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care Medicine, and Sleep Disorders, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. Electronic address: r0cava01@louisville.edu.
Chest ; 161(4): 927-936, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1650215
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Confusion, Urea > 7 mM, Respiratory Rate ≥ 30 breaths/min, BP < 90 mm Hg (Systolic) or < 60 mm Hg (Diastolic), Age ≥ 65 Years (CURB-65) score and the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) are well-established clinical prediction rules for predicting mortality in patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). SARS-CoV-2 has emerged as a new etiologic agent for CAP, but the role of CURB-65 score and PSI have not been established. RESEARCH QUESTION How effective are CURB-65 score and PSI at predicting in-hospital mortality resulting from SARS-CoV-2 CAP compared with non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP? Can these clinical prediction rules be optimized to predict mortality in SARS-CoV-2 CAP by addition of procalcitonin and D-dimer? STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

Secondary analysis of two prospective cohorts of patients with SARS-CoV-2 CAP or non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP from eight adult hospitals in Louisville, Kentucky.

RESULTS:

The in-hospital mortality rate was 19% for patients with SARS-CoV-2 CAP and 6.5% for patients with non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP. For the PSI score, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis resulted in an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.86) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.77-0.80) for patients with SARS-CoV-2 CAP and non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP, respectively. For the CURB-65 score, ROC analysis resulted in an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.75-0.84) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.73-0.77) for patients with SARS-CoV-2 CAP and non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP, respectively. In SARS-CoV-2 CAP, the addition of D-dimer (optimal cutoff, 1,813 µg/mL) and procalcitonin (optimal cutoff, 0.19 ng/mL) to PSI and CURB-65 score provided negligible improvement in prognostic performance.

INTERPRETATION:

PSI and CURB-65 score can predict in-hospital mortality for patients with SARS-CoV-2 CAP and non-SARS-CoV-2 CAP comparatively. In patients with SARS-CoV-2 CAP, the inclusion of either D-dimer or procalcitonin to PSI or CURB-65 score did not improve the prognostic performance of either score. In patients with CAP, regardless of cause, PSI and CURB-65 score remain adequate for predicting mortality in clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia / Community-Acquired Infections / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans Language: English Journal: Chest Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pneumonia / Community-Acquired Infections / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Etiology study / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Aged / Humans Language: English Journal: Chest Year: 2022 Document Type: Article