Your browser doesn't support javascript.
SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine effectiveness in England (REACT-1): a series of cross-sectional random community surveys.
Chadeau-Hyam, Marc; Wang, Haowei; Eales, Oliver; Haw, David; Bodinier, Barbara; Whitaker, Matthew; Walters, Caroline E; Ainslie, Kylie E C; Atchison, Christina; Fronterre, Claudio; Diggle, Peter J; Page, Andrew J; Trotter, Alexander J; Ashby, Deborah; Barclay, Wendy; Taylor, Graham; Cooke, Graham; Ward, Helen; Darzi, Ara; Riley, Steven; Donnelly, Christl A; Elliott, Paul.
  • Chadeau-Hyam M; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Wang H; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Global infectious Disease Analysis and Jameel Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Eales O; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Global infectious Disease Analysis and Jameel Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Haw D; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Global infectious Disease Analysis and Jameel Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Bodinier B; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Whitaker M; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Walters CE; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Global infectious Disease Analysis and Jameel Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Ainslie KEC; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Global infectious Disease Analysis and Jameel Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.
  • Atchison C; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Fronterre C; CHICAS, Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, UK and Health Data Research, Lancaster, UK.
  • Diggle PJ; CHICAS, Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, UK and Health Data Research, Lancaster, UK.
  • Page AJ; Quadram Institute, Norwich, UK.
  • Trotter AJ; Quadram Institute, Norwich, UK.
  • Ashby D; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Barclay W; Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Taylor G; Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Cooke G; Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
  • Ward H; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
  • Darzi A; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK; Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Riley S; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Global infectious Disease Analysis and Jameel Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  • Donnelly CA; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Global infectious Disease Analysis and Jameel Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: c.donnelly@imperial.ac.uk.
  • Elliott P; School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
Lancet Respir Med ; 10(4): 355-366, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1655306
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

England has experienced a third wave of the COVID-19 epidemic since the end of May, 2021, coinciding with the rapid spread of the delta (B.1.617.2) variant, despite high levels of vaccination among adults. Vaccination rates (single dose) in England are lower among children aged 16-17 years and 12-15 years, whose vaccination in England commenced in August and September, 2021, respectively. We aimed to analyse the underlying dynamics driving patterns in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence during September, 2021, in England.

METHODS:

The REal-time Assessment of Community Transmission-1 (REACT-1) study, which commenced data collection in May, 2020, involves a series of random cross-sectional surveys in the general population of England aged 5 years and older. Using RT-PCR swab positivity data from 100 527 participants with valid throat and nose swabs in round 14 of REACT-1 (Sept 9-27, 2021), we estimated community-based prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and vaccine effectiveness against infection by combining round 14 data with data from round 13 (June 24 to July 12, 2021; n=172 862).

FINDINGS:

During September, 2021, we estimated a mean RT-PCR positivity rate of 0·83% (95% CrI 0·76-0·89), with a reproduction number (R) overall of 1·03 (95% CrI 0·94-1·14). Among the 475 (62·2%) of 764 sequenced positive swabs, all were of the delta variant; 22 (4·63%; 95% CI 3·07-6·91) included the Tyr145His mutation in the spike protein associated with the AY.4 sublineage, and there was one Glu484Lys mutation. Age, region, key worker status, and household size jointly contributed to the risk of swab positivity. The highest weighted prevalence was observed among children aged 5-12 years, at 2·32% (95% CrI 1·96-2·73) and those aged 13-17 years, at 2·55% (2·11-3·08). The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic grew in those aged 5-11 years, with an R of 1·42 (95% CrI 1·18-1·68), but declined in those aged 18-54 years, with an R of 0·81 (0·68-0·97). At ages 18-64 years, the adjusted vaccine effectiveness against infection was 62·8% (95% CI 49·3-72·7) after two doses compared to unvaccinated people, for all vaccines combined, 44·8% (22·5-60·7) for the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccine, and 71·3% (56·6-81·0) for the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine. In individuals aged 18 years and older, the weighted prevalence of swab positivity was 0·35% (95% CrI 0·31-0·40) if the second dose was administered up to 3 months before their swab but 0·55% (0·50-0·61) for those who received their second dose 3-6 months before their swab, compared to 1·76% (1·60-1·95) among unvaccinated individuals.

INTERPRETATION:

In September, 2021, at the start of the autumn school term in England, infections were increasing exponentially in children aged 5-17 years, at a time when vaccination rates were low in this age group. In adults, compared to those who received their second dose less than 3 months ago, the higher prevalence of swab positivity at 3-6 months following two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine suggests an increased risk of breakthrough infections during this period. The vaccination programme needs to reach children as well as unvaccinated and partially vaccinated adults to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission and associated disruptions to work and education.

FUNDING:

Department of Health and Social Care, England.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines / Variants Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Lancet Respir Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S2213-2600(21)00542-7

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines / Variants Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Lancet Respir Med Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S2213-2600(21)00542-7