Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Characterization of ophthalmology virtual visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Valentim, Carolina C S; Muste, Justin C; Iyer, Amogh I; Krause, Michael A; Kalur, Aneesha; Gendi, Steve W; Ohlhausen, Marc; Rachitskaya, Aleksandra; Singh, Rishi P; Talcott, Katherine E.
  • Valentim CCS; Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Muste JC; Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Iyer AI; Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Krause MA; Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Kalur A; Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Gendi SW; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Ohlhausen M; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Rachitskaya A; Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Singh RP; Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Talcott KE; Center for Ophthalmic Bioinformatics, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. talcotk@ccf.org.
Eye (Lond) ; 2022 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2236534
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To characterize the use of virtual visits, as well as compare the characteristics to in-person visits during the pandemic period.

METHODS:

This retrospective study included patients who had virtual and in-person ophthalmology visits from March 19, 2020, to July 31, 2020, in a large multispecialty ophthalmic center. Exclusion criteria included patients aged less than 18 years old; canceled, incomplete, mislabelled, and duplicated visits. 2943 virtual and 56,174 in-person visits were identified. A random sample of 3000 in-person visits was created. Each visit was analyzed as an individual data point.

RESULTS:

2,266 virtual visits (2,049 patients, 64.3% female, mean [SD] age 64.3 [16.6] years old) and 2590 in-person visits (2509 patients, 59.5% female, 65.9 [15.8] years old) were included. Most virtual visits were classified as comprehensive ophthalmology (34.6%), optometry-related (19.5%), and oculoplastics (13.0%). For in-person visits, the most common specialties were optometry (29.8%), comprehensive ophthalmology (23.9%), and retina and uveitis (17.3%). The most common diagnoses in the virtual group were from the eyelids, lacrimal system, and orbits group (26.9%), while in the in-person groups were choroid and retina conditions (19.3%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Numerous ocular conditions were evaluated and managed through virtual visits, and external complaints and oculoplastic consults appear to be well-suited to the virtual format. Further studies focusing on visual outcomes and patient experience will be beneficial.

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal subject: Ophthalmology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41433-022-01938-2

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal subject: Ophthalmology Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S41433-022-01938-2